Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hayes v. K-Mart Corp., 665 N.W.2d 550.

19 citing documents.

Aaron Thevenot, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(good cause to quit existed when employer breached promise to give employee a raise), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Mary Chasteen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, (breach of promise that applicant would receive a pay raise), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Cleo K. Clemmer, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 This court has determined that “[g]ood cause to quit is generally found where an employer has breached the terms of an employment agreement.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Trevor Hogan, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Hayes v. K-Mart Corp. , 2 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Matthew Frie, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether a claimant is properly disqualified from the receipt of unemployment benefits is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.”
Crysta Anglin, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether a claimant is properly disqualified from the receipt of unemployment benefits is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.” d 550, 552 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Nurieni Abdi, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hayes v. K-Mart Corp. , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Eva B. Johnson, Relator v. Viking Magazine Service, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Eva B. Johnson, Relator v. Viking Magazine Service, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether a claimant is properly disqualified from the receipt of unemployment benefits is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
Mark Larsson, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Larsson, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Whether a claimant is properly disqualified from the receipt of unemployment benefits is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We have held that “[g]ood cause to quit is generally found where an employer has breached the terms of an employment agreement.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
Cody Sigfrid, Relator v. Osseo Powersports, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cody Sigfrid, Relator v. Osseo Powersports, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Grunow v. WALSER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP LLC 779 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Grunow v. WALSER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP LLC 779 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP. 702 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP. 702 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In each of these cases, we found good cause for an employee to resign when the employer breached a promise contained in an employment agreement and “concerning the terms or conditions of employment.” -54 (Minn.App.2003) (citing Krantz v. Loxtercamp Transp., Inc., Baker v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops No. 154, ), review denied (Minn. Sept.