Cited by

We note that, “[o]n appeal, the duty to provide a transcript is on the party seeking review of the rulings being challenged.” (declining to dismiss an appeal “[b]ecause we can review aspects of the issues raised by appellant even without a transcript”).

(affirming district court’s adjustment to parties’ stipulated division of property to account for a decrease in value of an account); WL 6836788, at *3-5 (Minn. App. Dec.

(noting that it is “elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented”); (clarifying that appellant’s duty includes the preparation of any necessary transcripts).

(“On appeal, the duty to provide a transcript is on the party seeking review of the rulings being challenged.”); (noting the duty to order a transcript applies to self -represented appellants).

4 “While the lack of a transcript does not automatically require dismissal of an entire appeal, lack of a transcript does limit the scope of appellate review to whether the district court’ s conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact.” (citing Duluth Herald & ).

-08 (Minn. App. 2003); see also Rios v. Jennie-O 6 Turkey Store, Inc. , (noting, in context of construing contract, parties to contract are presumed to enter into it with reference to applicable law u nless contract evidences contrary intent).

1; (reversing and remanding division of marital property with specific instructions that the district court “may consider factors such as appellant’s contribution to the preservation of the [property]” and to adjust the marital property division to acc ount for a substantial change in value of the property); (affirming district court’s adjustment to parties’ stipulated division of property to account for $31,331 decrease in value of an account awarded to husband).

Cf. Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co. , 286 Minn. 495 , 498, , 555 (1970) (refusing to dismiss appeal for failure to obtain a transcript, but limiting review to conclusions of law); In re Marriage of Bender , , 605 (Minn. App. 2003) ("While the lack of a transcript does not automatically require dismissal of an entire appeal, lack of a transcript does limit the scope of appellate review to whether the district court's conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fac

Cf. Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498, (refusing to dismiss appeal for failure to obtain a transcript, but limiting review to conclusions of law); (“While the lack of a transcript does not automatically require dismissal of an entire appeal, lack of a transcript does limit the scope 12 of appellate review to whether the district c ourt’s conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact.”).

(“On appeal, the duty to provide a transcript is on the party seeking review of the rulings being challenged.”).

(stating that under the Hor-tis/Valento formula, “separate support obligations are set for each parent, but only for the periods of time that the other parent has physical custody of the children” (citing Schlichting, d at 792 )).

Under the Hortis/Valento formula, “separate support obligations are set for each parent, but only for the periods of time that the other parent has physical custody of the children, and a single net payment is determined by offsetting the two obligations against each other.” (citing Schlichting, d at 792 ).