Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 342 N.W.2d 638.

80 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(-41 (Minn. App. 1984)).
Ronald Kenneth Maas, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-41 (Minn. App. 1984) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-41 (Minn. App. 1984); (explaining that mere possibility of an innocent explanation for conduct does not negate probable cause).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The existence of probable cause must be evaluated “from the po int of view of a prudent and cautious officer on the s cene at the time of the arrest.” State v. Olson , (quotation om itted).
State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(in determining probable cause the court must “view the circumstances in light of the whole of the arresting officer’s police experience as of the time of the arrest.”); (“Probable cause is not based upon the ‘reasonable man’ concept, but upon the situation of the officer and the particular situation in which he finds himself, conditioned by his observations, information, training and experience.” (quotation omitted)).
In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of Strecker 777 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of Strecker 777 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(defining probable cause as “circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in believing the accused to be guilty”); State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 263-64 , (“The constitutional mandate requiring ‘probable cause’ and the statutory standard of ‘reasonable cause’ are synonymous.”); (“probable cause and reasonable cause are synonymous”); see also Black’s Law Dictionary, 1321, 1380 (9th ed.2009) (defining “reasonable cause” synonymously with “probable cause” and defining
Reeves v. Commissioner of Public Safety 751 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Reeves v. Commissioner of Public Safety 751 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“[T]he duty of the reviewing court is simply to ensure that the officer had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause [for arrest for DWI] existed at the time of invoking the implied consent law.” (citation omitted).
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Groe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 615 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Groe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 615 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
This court does not review probable cause determinations de novo, instead, we determine if the police officer “had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed at the time of invoking the implied consent law.” (citing Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct.
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In reviewing a probable cause determination, this court does not review the determination de novo; rather the court looks to see if the officer “had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed at the time of invoking the implied consent law.” (citing Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct.
Flamang v. Commissioner of Public Safety 516 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Flamang v. Commissioner of Public Safety 516 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Snyder v. Commissioner of Public Safety 496 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Snyder v. Commissioner of Public Safety 496 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
d at 363-64 ; (Minn.App.
State v. Shepard 473 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Steele v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Steele v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
this court stated that reviewing courts are to give “great deference” to the peace officer’s determination.
Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Holm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
this court noted that each case must be decided on its own facts, and in reviewing an officer’s probable cause determination “great deference” should be paid by the reviewing court.
Nesseth v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nesseth v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Shewchuk 412 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Shewchuk 412 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Purnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Purnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Andersen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hedstrom v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Andersen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
141 , 11 L.Ed.2d 94 (1963) (citation omitted)
Hedstrom v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dutcher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dutcher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vangstad v. Commissioner of Public Safety 404 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vangstad v. Commissioner of Public Safety 404 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kurosak v. Commissioner of Public Safety 402 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kurosak v. Commissioner of Public Safety 402 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weldon v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weldon v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holland v. Commissioner of Public Safety 385 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holland v. Commissioner of Public Safety 385 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Feil v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by