Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, 454 N.W.2d 916.

76 citing documents.

In Re the Custody of: A. A. S., Karryn Colleen Schwab v. Ryan George Schenck, County of Clay, … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Custody of: A. A. S., Karryn Colleen Schwab v. Ryan George Schenck, County of Clay, … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC v. The Walking Company, WalkingCo, LLC f/k/a Walking Company Acquisition LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Molde v. CitiMortgage, Inc., Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, (holding that the district court has considerable discretion in ruling on discovery requests, and therefore, appellate courts will not reverse its ruling absent a clear abuse of that discretion).
In the Matter of the Trust Created under Agreement By and Between Barbara A Gaughan, Settlor, and Barbara … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Trust Created under Agreement By and Between Barbara A Gaughan, Settlor, and Barbara … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Hill, d at 490; (“[A] [district court] judge has wide discretion to issue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.”).
Greenvale Township v. Linus Langer, Gregory Langer Minn. Ct. App. 2025
e maintains that the district court could consider limitations on discovery only after determining whether Greenvale was entitled to discovery in the first instance.4 A district court “judge has wide discretion to issue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.” Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Daniel Hatlevig v. Jason Schott, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Todd C. Dooley, et al v. Jason R. Ross, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Carol Audrey Jones, Sadie Rae Jones, Clark Edward Jones v. State Farm Insurance Company Fire Claims Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Madison Equities, Inc., et al., Minn. 2021
Hatch , (noting that “[a] district court has broad discretion ‘to issue discovery orders’ and will be reversed on appeal only upon an abuse of such discretion” (quoting Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, )).
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Peterson v. Colleen Marie Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
In re the Marriage of: Janie Warren Berg v. David A. Berg Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The trial judge has wide discretion to issue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.” ( quoting Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, ), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Ann Reichert v. Matthew Alan Born, County of Dakota, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen , Gunnufson v. Onan Corp.
In re the Marriage of: Beatrice De Ann Steele v. Steven Paul Steele Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom 925 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2019
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom 925 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2019
Safety , , 711 (Minn. 2007) (quoting Shetka v. Kueppers , , 921 (Minn. 1990) ).
Ellis Olkon, et al v. City of Medina Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt v. Gary Dennis Vogt Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Dr. Jonathan Peterson v. Ruth Martinez, in her Official Capacity, et al., The Professional Renewal Center Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Paul Ronny Barsness v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D. Motion-to-compel claims “[T]he [district court] judge has wide discretion to iss ue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.” Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Daniel J. Donahue v. Dakota County, Inver Grove Heights Police Department Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, d 916, 921 (Minn. 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Russell Severtson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Russell Severtson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et al., Co-Appellants, Wayne … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et al., Co-Appellants, Wayne … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, Frontier Ins.
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court “has wide discretion to issue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.” Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, d 916, 921 (Minn. 1990).
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“[T]he trial judge has wide discretion to issue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.” Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Frontier Insurance Co. v. Frontline Processing Corp. 788 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Frontier Insurance Co. v. Frontline Processing Corp. 788 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, (stating that discovery rulings are reviewed for an abuse of discretion).
In Re Contest of General Election 767 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 2009
In Re Contest of General Election 767 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 2009
In Re Contest of General Election 767 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 2009
*470 See Sheika v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
In Re Contest of General Election 767 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 2009
*470 See Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
State v. Underdahl 767 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2009
State v. Underdahl 767 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2009
Safety (Underdahl I), ().
State v. Underdahl 749 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Underdahl 749 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen
Underdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 735 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2007
Underdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 735 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2007
“[A] trial judge has wide discretion to issue discovery orders and, absent clear abuse of that discretion, normally its order with respect thereto will not be disturbed.”
In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Involving File No. 17139 720 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2006
In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Involving File No. 17139 720 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2006
Hatch, (quoting Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, ).
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2004
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2004
See Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen, (“information subject to discovery must, at least, be likely to lead to relevant admissible evidence”); (stating that absent a clear abuse of discretion, a district court’s decision regarding discovery requests in civil actions will not be reverse
Moren Ex Rel. Moren v. Jax Restaurant 679 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 2004