Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980, 550 N.W.2d 618.

50 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Leah Christina Graeber Minn. 2026
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Leah Christina Graeber Minn. 2026
1980, (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.T.B Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.T.B Minn. 2025
Ass’n, Local 1980, n.9 (1996)).
Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,... Minn. 2025
Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,... Minn. 2025
Ass’n, Local 1980, (stating that “judicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us”).
State of Minnesota v. Dale Edward Lehman, Jr. Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Dale Edward Lehman, Jr. Minn. 2024
1980, (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
Minn. 2023
1980, (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
Minn. 2022
Ass’n, (stating that “judicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us”).
Minn. 2021
Ass’n, Local 1980 , (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”); see also United States v. Young , 470 U.S. 1, 15 (1985) (“Any unwarranted extension of this exacting defin ition of plain error would skew the Rule’s ‘car
Mark Jerome Johnson, Minn. 2021
Ass’n, Local 1980 , (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
A19-1701 A19-1702 A19-1703 Minn. 2020
Ass’n, Local 1980 , (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
Stacey Marable, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Emp s. Ass’n, Local 1980, aff’d
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Maxim Kenneth Rhone. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ass’n, Local 1980 , (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular 7 controversy before us.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ass’n, Local 1980, (stating that “judicial restraint binds us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us”).
Mahfooz Y. Saad, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, Local 1980 , 1 Saad’s FDCPA claims require proof that respondents threatened to “take [an] action that cannot legally be taken,” collected an amount that is not “expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by l aw,” or threatened to forec
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, Local 1980, aff'd
Leland Bertsch, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, Local 1980 , (“[J]udicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ass’n, Local 1980, (“[Jjudicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”); see.
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 878 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John S. Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 867 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John S. Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 867 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980, d 618, 622 (Minn. 1996).
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
Ass’n, Local 1980, (explaining that "judicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us”).
Wayne v. State 832 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2013
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co. 814 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co. 814 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Ass’n, Local 1980, (“[Jjudicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”); (“The function of the court of appeals is limited to identifying errors and then correcting them.”).
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980, (“[JJudicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.”).
Nelson v. Holland 776 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Nelson v. Holland 776 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980, -30 (Minn.App.1995) (unfair-representation claims survive but Human Rights Acts claims and claims for assault, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and discrimination do not), aff'd
EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of Hennepin 723 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 2006
EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of Hennepin 723 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 2006
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980, (stating that “judicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us”).
State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
Allen v. Hennepin County 680 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Allen v. Hennepin County 680 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980, , 621 n. 7 (Minn.1996).
Turek v. NORTHFIELD FREEZINGS 652 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2002
Turek v. NORTHFIELD FREEZINGS 652 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2002
Employees Ass’n, (declining to decide issues not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy).
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980
Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc. 611 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc. 611 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980, aff'd
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Employees Ass’n, Local 1980
Middleton Ex Rel. Middleton v. Northwest Airlines 600 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1999

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by