Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Welfare of MH, 595 N.W.2d 223.

26 citing documents.

A25-1089 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. R. M. P., Mother. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. A. B. and A. D. C. V., … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
There is a “presumption that [the] natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of his child and that it is ordinarily in the best interest of a child to be in the custody of his natural parent.” d 223, 227 (Minn. App. 1999) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: A. M. B. and M. J. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. F. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 223, 229 (Minn. App. 1999) (noting that, “[e]ven in the context of termination of parental rights, failure to raise constitutional issues in the district court precludes the issues from being raised on appeal”); In re Welfare of C.L.L ., 3 (refusing to consider constitutional issue raise
A17-1514 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“Only one [statutory] criterion needs to be proven to support termination.”).
A17-0231 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[M]aking only minimal progress supports the conclusion that the present conditions will continue for 10 a prolonged, indeterminate period and that termination is proper.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. S. W. and J. L. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Only one [statutory] criterion needs to be proven to support termination.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. M. R. and T. P. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. M. R. and T. P. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
For this argument, appellant relies on
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–29 (Minn. App. 1999) (affirming district court’s decision not to terminate mother’s parental rights even though child needed therapy, was hesitant to see mother, and termination would be in child’s best interest).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The county’s burden is “subject to the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of his child and that it is ordinarily in the best interest of a child to be in the custody of his natural parent.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(“Only one [statutory] criterion needs to be proven to support termination.”).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-11 (Minn.2003) (permitting review of “substantive questions of law” not raised in posttrial motions but properly raised during trial).