Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Franklin, 604 N.W.2d 79.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ethan Joseph Metzer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ethan Joseph Metzer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. M. B., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. M. B., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In certain circumstances, “a district court has discretion to stay imposition of a sentence and order probation with certain conditions.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Scott James Boorman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott James Boorman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Ivan Kotten Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Ivan Kotten Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones 869 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones 869 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
2 2 Bursch’s failure to raise this issue in the district court does not prevent him from raising it on appeal.
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When reviewing a sentence imposed or stayed by a district court, [appellate courts] do so under an abuse of discretion standard.”
State of Minnesota v. Kanishka Shereal Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kanishka Shereal Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We review a district court’s sentencing decision for an abuse of discretion and will not interfere “as long as the record shows the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” -81 (Minn. App. 1985)
State v. Bradley 756 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Bradley 756 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2008