Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken, 396 N.W.2d 253.

36 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Haasken v. Haasken , (reviewing for clear error a district court’s determination that bonuses were not sufficiently dependable).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
profitability.” d 253, 261 (Minn. App. 1986).
In re the Marriage of: Shima Shojaee Falavarjani v. Navid Tabrizi Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Shima Shojaee Falavarjani v. Navid Tabrizi Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bonuses may be included as income if the district court finds that the bonus is “the type of income which could or should provide a dependable source of child support.” (quotation omitted).
Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Brandt -Rucker, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Haasken v. Haasken , d 253, 261 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that bonus income may be included if the district court finds that it is “the type of income which could or should provide a dependable source of child support”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 253, 261 (Minn. App. 1986) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $0 to $9,000 did not constitute income); Desrosier v. Desrosier , -09 (Minn. App. 1996) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $7,000 to $17,000 constituted income).
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Winesett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(conclud ing irregular annual bonuses ranging from $0 to $9,000 did not constitute income); -09 (Minn. App. 1996) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $7,000 to $17,000 constituted income).
In the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But see Haasken v. Haasken , (concluding district court did not err in finding annual bonuses ranging from $0 to $9,000 did not constitute income).5 5 The child -support statutes do not explicitly state whether refundable tax credits are “income,” but they do require dis
In re the Marriage of: Dodamwalage Dinesh Jayawardena, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at 508 (four years of bonus ranging from $7,000 to $17,000); (affirming exclusion of bonus from income because determination that payments ranging from $0 to $9,000 were not “dependable” was “not clearly erroneous” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Dennis D. Dickinson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A [district] co urt has wide discretion in determining spousal maintenance.” Haasken v. Haasken , (Minn. 2 Although appellant argued below that his motion was one for am ended findings and not a motion for reconsideration, appellant has failed to raise the issue on appeal.
County of Washington v. TMT Land V, LLC 791 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
County of Washington v. TMT Land V, LLC 791 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier 551 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier 551 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
at 68 (noting appellant’s ).
Barnier v. Wells 476 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Barnier v. Wells 476 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of McCulloch v. McCulloch 435 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of McCulloch v. McCulloch 435 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
this court determined that the trial court was not clearly erroneous in concluding that husband’s bonuses did not constitute income for purposes of determining child support obligations where payment of future bonuses depended on profitability of husband’s employer.
Marriage of Joneja v. Joneja 422 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Davey v. Davey 415 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Davey v. Davey 415 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Novak v. Novak 406 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Novak v. Novak 406 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellant relies, however, where this court upheld a trial court’s determination periodic annual bonuses ranging from 0-$9000 did not constitute income when establishing the level of child support.
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Similarly, we held that a ten-month delay in deciding a case did not require a new trial absent a showing of prejudice.