Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wynne, 552 N.W.2d 218.

41 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Johnathon Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. B. M., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under th e circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
the defendant arrived at her home to find officers searching the home pursuant to a premises warrant.
Jesse Lee Helget (A20-1036) v. Commissioner of Public Safety, State of Minnesota, vs. Jesse Lee Helget (A22-0103) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Julie Marie Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Amber Kay Barrow Minn. Ct. App. 2022
However, she claims that her purse was “an extension of her person,” and, therefore, not a “container” subject to the automobile exception.
State of Minnesota v. Resa Lynn Gauthier Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Chris Becerra Minn. Ct. App. 2018
For example, “a shoulder purse is so closely associated with the person that it is identified with and included within the concept of one’s person.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Bradley 908 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Bradley 908 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Wynne , , 220 (Minn. 1996) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Xavier Richard Jamieson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
” (citing Summers, 452 U.S. at 705, 101 S. Ct. at 2595 -96).
State v. Molnau 904 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2017
State v. Molnau 904 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2017
338 , 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979) (holding that a search warrant authorizing the search of a tavern and a bartender did not authorize police to search customers at the tavern when the warrant was executed); (recognizing that a purse carried by a person is protected from search under a premises warrant because it is an extension of the person).
State of Minnesota v. Abel Ricardo Mendoza, III Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(concluding that “a shoulder purse is so closely associated with the person” that it does not fall within the ambit of a warrant authorizing the search of a premises (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Tara Renaye Molnau Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tara Renaye Molnau Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(quotation omitted); (“A search warrant authorizing the search of a particular building or premises does not give the officers the right to search all persons who may be found in it.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Devin Keith Barner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Devin Keith Barner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An officer has probable cause to arrest a person when “objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Weseman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Weseman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence [would] entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christine Michelle Lacroix Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christine Michelle Lacroix Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-23 (Minn. 1996) (holding that the search of a purse seized from a woman who arrived at her mother’s house when police were executing a search warrant was not encompassed by the scope of the warrant).
In Re Tiffany O. 174 P.3d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Probable cause to arrest exists when, under the totality of facts and circumstances, “a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” () (quotation marks omitted).
State v. Kier 678 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Kier 678 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Wasson 602 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Wasson 602 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances, a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” G.M., d at 695 (); see State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 196 , *420 (officer has probable cause to arrest when “conditioned by his observations and information, and guided by the whole of his police experience, reasonably could have believed that a crime had been committe
State v. Carver 577 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Carver 577 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(citations and quotation omitted).
State v. Hardy 577 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1998
State v. Hardy 577 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1998
“An arresting officer may search the arrestee and the area within the immediate control of the arrestee in order to prevent destruction of evidence or to remove any weapons that the arrestee might use to resist arrest or effect escape.”
In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
Whereas probable cause to search requires police to have a reasonable belief that incriminating evidence is in a certain location, probable cause to arrest requires police to have a reasonable belief that a certain person has committed a crime, -22 (Minn.1996).