Cited by

“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under th e circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotations omitted).

the defendant arrived at her home to find officers searching the home pursuant to a premises warrant.

“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotation omitted).

However, she claims that her purse was “an extension of her person,” and, therefore, not a “container” subject to the automobile exception.

For example, “a shoulder purse is so closely associated with the person that it is identified with and included within the concept of one’s person.” (quotation omitted).

State v. Wynne , , 220 (Minn. 1996) (quotation omitted).

” (citing Summers, 452 U.S. at 705, 101 S. Ct. at 2595 -96).

338 , 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979) (holding that a search warrant authorizing the search of a tavern and a bartender did not authorize police to search customers at the tavern when the warrant was executed); (recognizing that a purse carried by a person is protected from search under a premises warrant because it is an extension of the person).

(concluding that “a shoulder purse is so closely associated with the person” that it does not fall within the ambit of a warrant authorizing the search of a premises (quotation omitted)).

(quotation omitted); (“A search warrant authorizing the search of a particular building or premises does not give the officers the right to search all persons who may be found in it.” (quotation omitted)).

An officer has probable cause to arrest a person when “objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotation omitted).

“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence [would] entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).

-23 (Minn. 1996) (holding that the search of a purse seized from a woman who arrived at her mother’s house when police were executing a search warrant was not encompassed by the scope of the warrant).

Probable cause to arrest exists when, under the totality of facts and circumstances, “a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” () (quotation marks omitted).

“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” (quotation omitted).

“The test of probable cause to arrest is whether the objective facts are such that under the circumstances, a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” G.M., d at 695 (); see State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 196 , *420 (officer has probable cause to arrest when “conditioned by his observations and information, and guided by the whole of his police experience, reasonably could have believed that a crime had been committe

(citations and quotation omitted).

“An arresting officer may search the arrestee and the area within the immediate control of the arrestee in order to prevent destruction of evidence or to remove any weapons that the arrestee might use to resist arrest or effect escape.”

Whereas probable cause to search requires police to have a reasonable belief that incriminating evidence is in a certain location, probable cause to arrest requires police to have a reasonable belief that a certain person has committed a crime, -22 (Minn.1996).