Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stansell v. City of Northfield, 618 N.W.2d 814.

20 citing documents.

Approving the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for Archer Datacenters Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and Negative … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
bears directly upon [their] personal interest.’” (), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
MSP Apartments, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
[their] personal interest.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
App. P. 103.03), (addressing statutory standing), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota by Peters Sunset Beach, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
14 (Minn. App. 2000) (stating that “economic and cultural factors” are “beyond MERA’s intended scope”), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But the caselaw requires that the causal chain not be “too speculative.” Schaller, d at 268 (affirming summary-judgment dismissal of claim alleging speculative future noise violations); (affirming summary-judgment dismissal of claim alleging speculative future harm to historic resources), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of Trade Secret Designations of 2019 Cogeneration and Small Power Production Reports. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
at 797; see also Stansell v. City of Northfield , -19 (Minn. App. 2000) (holding that residents were not aggrieved parties with standing to challenge ordinances where they did “ not allege that they [had] suffered any specific injuries” and instead “ seem[ed] to be litigati ng a matter of public interest”) , review denied (Minn. Jan.
Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“We will affirm a grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any ground.”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
review denied (Minn. Jan.
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“As a matter of statutory construction, we presume that the legislature uses the same words the same way, even in different statutes.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
Busch v. Model Corp. 708 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Busch v. Model Corp. 708 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“As a matter of statutory construction, we presume that the legislature uses the same words the same way, even in different statutes.” (MinmApp.
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Appellants argue that (1) review denied (Minn. Jan.
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church 672 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church 672 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A person is “aggrieved” when a municipality’s action adversely “operates on his rights of property or bears directly upon his personal interest.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.