Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matson v. Matson, 333 N.W.2d 862.

32 citing documents.

Nona Chubboy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(rejecting application of rule 60.02 “to foreign judgments in the same manner it is applied to judgments of the courts of this state”).
Mary J. Dykstra, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[T]he Full Faith and Credit Clause requires that courts of this state recognize and enforce judgments of other states even though they could not be obtained under Minnesota law.”
Megan Guetzkow v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Megan Guetzkow v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The Estate of Michael T. Conneran, Jr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See, e.g., U.S. Const. art. IV, § 1 (requiring states, through the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to enforce judgments from other states); (addressing the Full Faith and Credit Clause).
William Woischke, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Under that c onstitutional doctrine, Minnesota courts must “recognize and enforce judgments of other states even though they could not be attained under Minnesota law.”
Alaaldeen Mussa, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew David Feeney. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
AVR Communications, Ltd., creditors v. American Hearing Systems, Inc., d/b/a Interton, Inc., debtor 868 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
AVR Communications, Ltd., creditors v. American Hearing Systems, Inc., d/b/a Interton, Inc., debtor 868 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We are also not moved from our reasoning by Interton’s –68 (Minn. 1983).
Blume Law Firm PC v. Pierce 741 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Blume Law Firm PC v. Pierce 741 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Kasdan v. Berney 587 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Kasdan v. Berney 587 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
350-51 (Supp.1998); -68 (Minn.1983) (citing U.S. Const, art. IV, § 1 and stating full faith and credit requires each state shall recognize and enforce judgments of other states);.
State Inc. v. Sumpter & Williams 553 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State Inc. v. Sumpter & Williams 553 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Gibson v. Baxter 434 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Gibson v. Baxter 434 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
United Bank of Skyline v. Fales 395 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
United Bank of Skyline v. Fales 395 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court noted that the language of Minn.Stat.
Corsica Cheese, Inc. v. Roers Enterprises, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Corsica Cheese, Inc. v. Roers Enterprises, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McBroom v. Al-Chroma, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McBroom v. Al-Chroma, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 244 ; (adopting Durfee rule); Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 95, comments a & g (1971) (rendering state’s law of res judicata applies to judgments being enforced under the full faith and credit clause).
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight System 384 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight System 384 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
242, 244 , 11 L.Ed.2d 186 (1963)
State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. Erlandson 380 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. Erlandson 380 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Services Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson 363 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Services Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson 363 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
§ 518C.20 (1982) (a RURESA support order does not nullify an existing order “unless specifically provided by the court.”) However, addressed the issue whether a 1968 URESA order modified a 1961 decree.
State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon 337 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon 337 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
(Matson I); (Matson II).