Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Case v. State, 355 N.W.2d 117.

16 citing documents.

Court of Appeals Bryce Holstad, et al v. Town of May Hennesy, J. Concurring in part, dissenting in … Minn. 2026
Jacob Schlichter, et al v. City of Albert Lea, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A municipality has no inherent powers, but only such powers as are expressly conferred by statute or are implied as necessary in aid of those powers which are expressly conferred.”
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Minn. 2020
D-15 visited);15 (stating that while “[r]egulation of cigarette sales in a municipality has little or no effect upon other jurisdictions .
Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach 899 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A municipality has no inherent powers, but only such powers as are expressly conferred by statute or are implied as necessary in aid of those powers which are expressly conferred.”
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
See, (characterizing motions for attorney fee sanctions and costs and disbursements as collateral to the merits of the underlying litigation); (same).
Holt v. City of Sauk Rapids 559 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
We note, however, that even if appellants had prevailed, the essentially private nature of their action questioning Sauk Rapids’ right to regulate the keeping of dogs is a special circumstance placing them outside “the spirit of section 1988 fee awards.”
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co. v. Village of Golden Valley, 273 Minn. 301, 308 , (holding that village lacked statutory authority to license electricians); (holding that municipality lacked authority to regulate dredging when DNR had exclusive jurisdiction to issue dredge permits).
Minnesota Council of Dog Clubs v. City of Minneapolis 540 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
124 (Minn.1984), (citing Newman v. Piggie Park Enter., 390 U.S. 400, 402 , 88 S.Ct.
Lilly v. City of Minneapolis 527 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of St. Paul v. LaClair 466 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(), the court stated: A municipality has no inherent powers, but only such powers as are expressly conferred by statute or are implied as necessary in aid of those powers which are expressly conferred.
American Dog Owners Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 453 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
“Although section 1988 leaves an award of attorney fees to the discretion of the court, the United States Supreme Court requires an award of attorney fees to a prevailing party unless special circumstances would render an award unjust.”
Seiberlich v. Burlington Northern Railroad 447 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the supreme court discussed the propriety of the trial court’s denial of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C.
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS COM'N v. Univ. of Minn. 356 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights v. Univesrity of Minnesota 356 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1984