C3-83-1139
Precedential
Granted
Processed
Case v. State
Also decided on this docket: Minn. Ct. App., March 7, 1984 344 N.W.2d 888
Cited by
- Jacob Schlichter, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Minn. 2020
- Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach 899 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
- Holt v. City of Sauk Rapids 559 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Minnesota Council of Dog Clubs v. City of Minneapolis 540 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Lilly v. City of Minneapolis 527 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- City of St. Paul v. LaClair 466 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- American Dog Owners Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 453 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Seiberlich v. Burlington Northern Railroad 447 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Case v. State 344 N.W.2d 888
Opinion text
ORDER AMDAHL, Chief Justice. Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Raymond Arthur Case, Jr. for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 344 N.W.2d 888 , be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.