Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady, 448 N.W.2d 888.

35 citing documents.

Alexander James King, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, (citing Minn. Stat. § 588.12 (1988)) (“[C]ivil contempt is said to give the contemnor the keys to the jail cell .
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
5 performance of a valid court order, not to punish for past failure to perform.” (emphasis added).
American Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Inc., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Valentin Arkadievich Povarchuk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
As such, “[c]ivil contempt proceedings are designed to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish for past failure to perform.” 10 Here, the district court imposed a civil-contempt sanction.
Kevin James Kleinschmidt v. Angela Rose Farkash Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kevin James Kleinschmidt v. Angela Rose Farkash Minn. Ct. App. 2024
As such, “[c]ivil contempt proceedings are designed to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish for past failure to perform.”
John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix Minn. Ct. App. 2024
John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix Minn. Ct. App. 2024
As such, “[c]ivil contempt proceedings are designed to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish for past failure to perform.”
In re the Custody of H. T. J. and H. W. J., Minor Children, Tyler Raymond Johnson, Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Civil contempt proceedings are designed to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish for past failure to perform.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Meagan Gallo, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Civil contempt orders are remedial and “are designed to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish past failure to perform.”
Nicholas David Wivinus, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(explaining that, after district court has issued contempt order with purge conditions, at a later st age, the obligor is entitled to a hearing to determine whether he should be confined for failure to comply with purge conditions).
In re the Marriage of: Teresa Corinne MacNabb, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. Stat. § 588.12 (2020)
Town of West Lakeland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Civil contempt proceedings are designed to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish fo r past failure to perform.” d 888, 890 (Minn. App. 1989).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
at 224 (quotation omitted); (establishing a two-stage contempt proceeding).
Adam C. Steele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Nader Charles Kazeminy, Petitioner Below, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
For support, appellants cit e to Minn. State Bar Ass’n v. Divorce Assistance Ass’n, Inc.
Marriage of Zaldivar v. Rodriguez 819 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Zaldivar v. Rodriguez 819 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
The purpose of civil contempt proceedings is “to induce future performance of a valid court order, not to punish for past failure to perform.”
In Re Marriage of Crockarell 631 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Marriage of Crockarell 631 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(laying out a two-stage proceeding in contempt proceedings).
Marriage of Schubel v. Schubel 584 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Schubel v. Schubel 584 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(at second stage, court determines whether contemnor failed to comply without excuse); (contemnor given opportunity to show compliance or present excuse at second-stage hearing); see also D.D.
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 552 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 552 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of K.E.H. 542 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of K.E.H. 542 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 492 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 492 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
According to this court, “a civil contempt order cannot impose a fixed sentence, but must allow the contemnor to obtain release by compliance.” see also Minn.Stat.
Finch v. Marusich 457 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Finch v. Marusich 457 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by