Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nussbaumer v. Fetrow, 556 N.W.2d 595.

25 citing documents.

ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Glen Brazier, individually and as owner of Wagon Wheel Ridge, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5 (2021) (providing that an appeal from a board decision is a contested case for purposes of judicial review); (recognizing that “public policy favors the finality of judgments” and therefore “Minnesota law does not permit the collateral attack on a judgment valid on its face”), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. R. J. and B. J. J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (stating, in a civil case, that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (stating both that public policy favors the finality of rulings and the ability of parties to rely on those rulings and that Minnesota does not permit collateral attacks on facially valid rulings), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Klingelhutz Judgment, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An action to enforce a judgment seeks monetary recovery through equitab le relief or through a lien on real property .2 See Drewitz, d at 207 (stating the plaintiff was seeking to enforce a judgment through an equitable claim against a company in which he was a shareholder); (“A judgment lien provides the judgment creditor with the means to compel the judgment debtor to pay a debt .”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Community Finance Group, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
19, 2007) ; Nussbaumer v. Fetrow , -99 (Minn. App. 1996), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that Minnesota does not permit collateral attack of facially valid judgments, and judgments alleged to be merely erroneous or founded on nonjurisdictional defects are “not subject to attack”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Jane Ann Holm, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. 2 While we note that a judgment is final even if in error, d 626, 631 (Minn. App. 2006), review denied (Minn. May 16, 2006) , and that we do not permit collateral attacks on judgments on nonjurisdictional grounds, review denied (Minn. Feb.
Carl Green, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
A17-1552 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that “[a] judgment alle ged to be merely erroneous, or founded upon irregularities in the proceedings not going to the jurisdiction of the court, is not subject to attack”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Petition of CitiMortgage, Inc., a New York corporation, relating to Certificate of Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
sserted in a registration proceeding when the same claim had been asserted and dismissed with prejudice in a prior action between the same parties); (setting forth requirements for collateral estoppel, which are s imilar to requirements for res judicata but concern previously litigated issues rather than claims); Nussbaumer v. Fetrow , (stating that Minnesota does not permit collateral attacks on facially valid judgments), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. G. and B. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. , 275 Minn. 365, 370 -71, (stating, in a civil case, that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); Nussbaumer v. Fetrow , (stating Minnesota does not permit collateral attack s on facially valid judgments), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rachel B. Sabin. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rachel B. Sabin. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
5 (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Dahlin v. Kroening 784 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Elfelt 756 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Elfelt 756 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
review denied (Minn. Feb.
C & M Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Thondikulam 739 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
C & M Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Thondikulam 739 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Dailey v. Chermak 709 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dailey v. Chermak 709 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(stating Minnesota does not permit collateral attack of facially valid judgments, and judgments alleged to be merely erroneous or founded on nonjurisdictional defects are “not subject to attack”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 594 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 594 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(“Minnesota law does not permit the collateral attack of a judgment valid on its face.”) (citing Northwest Holding Co. v. Evanson, 265 Minn. 562, 569 , ), review denied (Minn. Feb.