Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., 649 N.W.2d 142.

112 citing documents.

Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc., … Minn. 2026
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc., … Minn. 2026
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Robyn Johnson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [appellate courts] will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
On appeal, the Olsons argue that the curative instruction was “erroneously given, untimely, [and] misleading.” “The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [appellate courts] will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
State of Minnesota v. Sidney Phillip Monette Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sidney Phillip Monette Minn. Ct. App. 2024
[appellate courts] will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., 1 Monette was initially sentenced to 45 months in prison.
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [appellate courts] will not reverse in the absence of [an] abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
A22-0724 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [appellate courts] will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [appellate courts] will not reverse in the absence of [an] abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jury Instruction “The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and we will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., d 142, 147 (Minn. 2002).
James David Stemm d/b/a Principle Personnel Group, plaintiff, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Ronald J. Bardine, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Eric Berg, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Big-D Construction Midwest, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and we will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and we will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., d 142, 147 (Minn. 2002).
Kathryn Ward Blum, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Sean Rand, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
5 D E C I S I O N Rand asserts that the district cou rt erred by refusing to instruct the jury on Minn. Stat. § 340A.502, because the defense raised the issue of voluntary intoxicatio n. “The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [appellate courts] will not reverse in the a bsence of an abuse of discretion.” See Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Ryan Larson, Minn. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions, and we will not reverse where jury instructions ‘overall fairly and correctly state the applicable law.’ ” (quoting Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. , , 147 (Minn. 2002).
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. , , 147 (Minn. 2002).
Cara Zimmer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and we will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Larson v. Gannett Co. 915 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Larson v. Gannett Co. 915 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. , , 147 (Minn. 2002).
Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and we will not re verse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. , 9 (Minn. 2002).
Asset Marketing Services, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and we will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., d 142, 147 (Minn. 2002).
Hearing Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Where instructions ove rall fairly and correctly state the applicable law, [a party] is not entitled to a new trial.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
William P. Brady, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“If a trial court’s instruction contains a co mplete and correct statement of the law, denial of the requested instruction, even if such instruction accurately states the law, is not ground for a new trial.” see also Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., (“Where instructions overall fairly and correctly state the applicable law, appellant is not entitled to a new trial.”).
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., Current Tech.
In re the Marriage of: David Lee Christensen v. Kathryn Florence Kladek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Lee Christensen v. Kathryn Florence Kladek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., (“[A]mbiguous contract terms must be construed against the drafter .
Mark Lanterman v. Michael Roman Afremov Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Lanterman v. Michael Roman Afremov Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
James L. Mandel v. Multiband Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James L. Mandel v. Multiband Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., -48 (Minn. 2002) (affirming use of CIVJIG 55.05, which defined cause and allowed jury to determine if employee was terminated for cause where employment contract did not define cause); -31 (Minn. 1983) (affirming jury finding of lack of good cause where emp
State of Minnesota v. True Thao 875 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. True Thao 875 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 2016
District courts “are afforded broad discretion and 13 considerable latitude in choosing the language of jury instructions.” Smith, d at 400 ( ).
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court has broad discretion in determining jury instructions and [an appellate court] will not reverse in the absence of abuse of discretion.” Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor Moua 875 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2016
Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor Moua 875 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2016
at 15 (citing Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc., ).
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.