Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Munoz, 385 N.W.2d 373.

30 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
20, 2004); (stating that an officer’s personal knowledge may corroborate other evidence and support probable cause).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, –77 (Minn. App. 1986) (holding that probable cause supported a lawful search based on, among other things, an 15 officer’s “personal knowledge of appellant,” including “appellant’s previous felony convictions,” as well as “appellant’s furtive movements”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rely on trained intuition and observations drawn from his experience”); -77 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that an officer had probable cause based on his observation of “glassine envelopes in plain view on the passenger side front floor mat” and experience “with such containers as being commonly used to market controlled substances”).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Starnes Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Starnes Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Paul Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Paul Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“When probable cause exists to believe that a vehicle contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment permits the police to search the vehicle without a warrant.”); (“Upon observing evidence in plain view, a warrantless search of the remainder of the passenger compartment is justified.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
( “Furtive gestures can provide a basis for probable cause.” ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
( stating that an officer’s knowledge of the defendant’s prior controlled-substance convictions corroborated an informant’s tip and authorized the warrantless search of a vehicle).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-77 (Minn. App. 1986) (“Upon observing [glassine envelopes in plain view on the p assenger side front floor mat], a warrantless search of the remainder of the passenger compartment [was] justified.”) In conclusion, any expectation of privacy that Downwind had in the vehicle’s interior yielded to the extent n
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-77 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that an officer who “observed glassine envelopes in plain view” and “was familiar with such containers as being commonly used to market controlled substances” could reasonably conclude that “controlled s ubstances might be present”).
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
25, 1992); (holding officer’s knowledge of driver’s prior sale and use of drugs and felony convictions corroborated informant’s tip to support warrantless search of vehicle).
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-78 (Minn. App. 1986) (affirming conviction based on the sufficiency of evidence that included, among other factors, defendant’s on-the-scene identification of a and “we defer .
State of Minnesota v. Travis Malik Galtney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Travis Malik Galtney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that “[f]urtive gestures can provide a basis for probable cause”).
State v. Dickey 827 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Dickey 827 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
Further, other than this case, we know of no court of appeals decision finding probable cause under circumstances similar to those now before us. See, (stating that “[ijurtive gestures can provide a basis for probable cause,” but noting that the totality of the circumstances also included an informant’s tip that the defendant was trying to sell drugs and an officer’s personal knowledge of the defendant’s criminal history).
State v. Denison 607 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Denison 607 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Schuette 423 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Schuette 423 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Collard 414 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Collard 414 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(officer observing glassine envelopes in plain view could search other areas of the car that were likely to contain similar evidence).
State v. Nace 404 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nace 404 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
*361 376 (Minn.Ct.App.1986).