Cited by

(explaining that the “phrase ‘good cause attributable to the employer’ does not encompass situations .

where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions.” d 12, 14 (Minn. App. 1986).

See Bongiovanni v. 10 Vanlor Investments

Day Care Ass’n, (reasoning that personality conflict did not constitute good reason to quit); d 12, 14 (Minn. App. 1986) (reasoning that “irreconcilable differences” with coworkers did not constitute good reason to quit).

A good reason to quit caused by an employer “does not encompass situations where an employee experiences irreconcilable differences with others at work or w here the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions.” Portz v. 8 Pipestone Skelgas

See, (holding that “[u]nsatisfactory working conditions and a poor relationship with a supervisor did not give [the employee] good cause to quit”); (holding that “disharmony between an executive and the employee” does not constitut

6 reason caused by the employer “does not encompass situations where an employee experiences irreconcilable differences with others at work or where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions.”

Day Care Ass’n , -24 (Minn. App. 1987) (stating that persona lity conflict did not constitute good reason to quit); Portz v. Pipestone Skelgas , (stating that “irreconcilable differences” with coworkers did not constitute good reason to quit).

Day Care Ass’n, -24 (Minn. App. 1987) (stating that “personality conflict” did not constitute good cause to quit); (stating that “irreconcilable differences with others at work” did not constitute good cause to quit) ; see also Werner v. Med.

In fact, when asked whether he complained about anyone other than the bookstore manager, Wrazidlo answered “[n]o.” 9 Family Day Care Ass’n, (stating that a “personality conflict” does not constitute good reason to quit); d 12, 14 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that “irreconcilable differences with others at work” does not constitute good reason to quit).

-82 (Minn. App. 1987); (stating that dissatisfaction with supervisor and working conditions does not constitute good cause to quit).

See, (holding that “[u]nsatisfactory working conditions and a poor relationship with a 6 supervisor” did not constitute good cause to quit).

“Good reason to quit caused by the employer” does not encompass situations “where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with [her] working conditions.”

where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions.”

d 12, 14 (Minn. App. 1986) (excluding from good cause to quit “situations where an employee experiences irreconcilable differences with others at work, or where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions”).

Similarly, this court stated: “The phrase ‘good cause attributable to the employer’ does not encompass situations where an employee experiences irreconcilable differences with others at work or where the employee is simply frustrated or dissatisfied with his working conditions.” Id.

: The representative’s written findings and conclusions refer to record evidence only, and we base our decision on that same evidence.