Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Pirkl, 531 N.W.2d 902.

23 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: DeRon Vaughnta Hazley. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-10 (Minn. App. 1995), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Daniel Albert Yungbauer. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Instead, appellant distinguishes rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Aaron Wayne White, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Malcolm Renfro. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Colten Chase Camacho. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Richard Allen Smuda. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-10 (Minn. App. 1995) ( concluding individual who had been in prison for nine years and thus had no recent sexual assaults , was nevertheless found to be at high risk for committing future sexual violence if returned to the community), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Scott Malz. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See In re Pirkl , -08 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alan Joseph Schiller. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jose Garcia Arellano Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Pirkl , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that “[w]here the findings of fact rest almost entirely on expert testimony, the [district] court’s evaluation of credibility is of particular significance”); (stating it is the district court’s job to weigh experts’ opinions regarding commitment), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
But, “[i]f a person has the ability to control the sexual impulse, the standard for commitment is not met.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Joelson v. O'KEEFE 594 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Matter of Ayers 570 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of Ayers 570 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
If a court finds that a person should be indeterminately committed as a sexually dangerous person or a sexual psychopathic personality, “[t]he court must find that there is no appropriate less restrictive alternative available.” (citing Minn. R. Civ.
In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-10 (Minn.App.1995) (conducting this type of analysis), review denied (Minn. Aug.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by