Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Tuttle, 504 N.W.2d 252.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Tieshawn Stevie Fields Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Tieshawn Stevie Fields Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, -57 (Minn. App. 1993) (determining that the victim’s recantation did not entitle the defendant to plea withdrawal).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Leith Renville Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-57 (Minn. App. 1993) (affirming district court’s rejection of defendant’s claim of innocence when guilty plea contained admission establishing guilt).
State of Minnesota v. Zittie Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Tuttle , -57 (Min n. App. 1993) (concluding that “mistaken apprehension of the strength of the state’s case” does not justify withdrawal under the fair-and-just standard); (adopting the plea process in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S. Ct. 160
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Buenfil Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Tuttle , -57 (Minn. A pp. 1993) (affirming a denial of a plea-withdrawal motion where a victim recanted their statement due, in part, because the defendant acknowledged his guilt and showed remorse).
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ray Quin, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The supreme court rejected a similar argument for plea withdrawal based on a witness ’s recantation, reasoning that the defendant’s guilt was established by “his own plea of guilty, which was based on an admission of guilt and on a statement that he was p leading guilty because he was guilty.” -57 (Minn. App. 1993).
State of Minnesota v. Victor Ciriaco-Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
see also State v. Tuttle , -57 (Minn. App. 1993) (finding no merits in claim that plea withdrawal should be permitted based upon “ a mistaken apprehension of the strength of the state’s case”).
Lonnie Har Larson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Tuttle , –57 (Minn. 1993).
State of Minnesota v. Bounlieng Moon Chaokhio Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Distinguished State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
First, he argues that his case is distinguishable from State v. Tuttle , a case in which we affirmed the district court's denial of a defendant's presentencing motion for plea withdrawal.
State of Minnesota v. Damon Michael DiMartino Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Jude Schnagl Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Robert James Jacka Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Alan Galardy Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-57 (Minn. App. 1993); see State v. Risken , (holding that the district court did not err in accepting guilty plea despite witness recantation because of 9 sufficient factual basis for the plea).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Timothy Reiten Minn. Ct. App. 2017
First, a district court may rely on a recantation to invalidate the factual basis of a guilty plea, but the court must be “reasonably certain that the recantation is genuine.” State v. Risken, 331 N .W.2d 489, 490 (Minn. 1983); cf. State v. Tuttle , - 587 (Minn. App. 1993) (affirming the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea after an alleged recantation because the strength of the state’s case is not relevant where guilt is 6 Rule 15.05, subdivision 1, includes a second standard for guilt
State of Minnesota v. Rudolph Gordon Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rudolph Gordon Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In any event, Cooper’s alleged “mistaken apprehension of the strength of the state’s case” against him did not entitle him to withdraw “his own plea of guilty, which was based on an admission of guilt and on a statement that he was pleading guilty because he was guilty.” –57 (Minn. App. 1993) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Giavonte Dominique Foulks Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Giavonte Dominique Foulks Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, -57 (Minn. App. 1993) (determining that victim’s recantation of charge did not entitle defendant to withdraw guilty plea under the fair-and-just standard on grounds that plea was based on mistaken belief of strength of state’s case); (holding that district court
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–57 (Minn. App. 1993) (affirming district court’s decision to reject defendant’s claim of innocence when guilty plea contained admission establishing guilt).
State of Minnesota v. Jason Wade Hostutler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Wade Hostutler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Vahabi 529 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Vahabi 529 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(trial court acted properly in explaining terms of agreement).
State v. Hamacher 511 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Hamacher 511 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1994