Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112, 515 N.W.2d 615.
-
Kristen M. Egan, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 No. 112, (quotation omitted).
-
Qays Abdi Ahmed, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
No. 112, Chaska, (quotation omitted).
-
Kristina Greene, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
No. 112, d 615, 617 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating that courts cannot add to a statute what the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks).
-
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Valentyn.
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
No. 112, (stating that courts cannot add to a statute what the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks).
- Dennis Bernard Freeman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Dennis Bernard Freeman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Doran v. Independent School District No. 720 831 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- Doran v. Independent School District No. 720 831 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- Ekman v. Miller 812 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Ekman v. Miller 812 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Ahmed 791 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
State v. Ahmed
791 N.W.2d 296
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
No. 112, it may add words or phrases when necessary to its interpretation if they "do not conflict with its obvious purpose and intent nor in any way affect its scope and operation.” Minn.Stat.
- KSTP-TV v. Ramsey County 787 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- KSTP-TV v. Ramsey County 787 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- Dahlin v. Kroening 784 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
In Re the Welfare of S.J.J.
755 N.W.2d 316
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
No. 112, (quotation omitted).
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 755 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe
755 N.W.2d 23
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
No. 112, see also Genin v.1996 Mercury Marquis, (rejecting construction of statute that would “add words to the statute [because] the rules governing statutory construction forbid that”).
- Christiansen v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 733 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Christiansen v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 733 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Braend Ex Rel. Minor Children v. Braend 721 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Braend Ex Rel. Minor Children v. Braend
721 N.W.2d 924
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
No. 112, (quotation omitted).
- Roer v. Dunham 682 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Roer v. Dunham
682 N.W.2d 179
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No. 112, (stating statutory rule of construction).
- River Valley Truck Center, Inc. v. Interstate Companies, Inc. 680 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- River Valley Truck Center, Inc. v. Interstate Companies, Inc. 680 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 667 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 667 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, VIN IFTSX31F1YEC59488 658 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, VIN IFTSX31F1YEC59488 658 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Nash v. Wollan 656 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Nash v. Wollan 656 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Collins 655 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Collins 655 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695 649 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695
649 N.W.2d 474
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No. 112, (suggesting that courts cannot add to a statute “what the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks” (quotations omitted)).
- Thomas v. Independent School District No. 2142 639 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Thomas v. Independent School District No. 2142
639 N.W.2d 619
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No. 112, (citation and internal quotation omitted).
- Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
638 N.W.2d 469
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No. 112, (suggesting that courts cannot add to a statute “what the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks” (quotation omitted)).
- Emanuel v. Independent School District No. 273 615 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Emanuel v. Independent School District No. 273
615 N.W.2d 415
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
112, (citation omitted).
- Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc. 611 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc.
611 N.W.2d 60
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
No. 112, Chaska, (court may not add words to statute).
- Vossen v. Parker 609 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Vossen v. Parker 609 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Deal v. Northwood Children's Home Society, Inc. 608 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Deal v. Northwood Children's Home Society, Inc. 608 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Hanson 583 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998