Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., 558 N.W.2d 770.

208 citing documents.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Steven Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., .
State of Minnesota v. Donald Charles Ancke Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
State of Minnesota v. Phoebus Phaeton Apollo Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be consid ered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.”) (quotation omitted).
Krenske Construction, Inc. v. Donald Draper, Angela Draper, AgStar Financial Services, FLCA Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
Heather Jones v. Hennepin County Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (“An assignment of error based on mere asse rtion and not supporte d by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived an d will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.”) (quotation omitted).
Ashley Rae Crapser v. Drake Wayne Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argum ent or authorities in [an] appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere ins pection.” State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. , (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. C. R. and T. R. M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
And an assignment of error that is based on mere assertion and is not supported by argument or legal authority is forfeited “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. , (quotation omitted) .
In re the Matter of: Joseph Loren Conner v. Jakklyn Marie Netland Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. , (issues not supported by analysis or argument are waived and need not be considered unless 9 prejudicial error is obvious on mere i nspection).
Donald Dean Oberfoell, individually and Do-Bid Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Do-Bid Online Auctions v. Bartley Nathaniel Kyte, a/k/a Bart … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(concluding issues not briefed on appeal are waived); State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial erro r is obvious on mere inspection.”) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Micheal Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Conduct of Karasov , n.12 (Minn. 2011); see also State v. Krosch , (stating that arguments are forfeited if the “brief contains no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”); State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is [forfeited] and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Dean Alley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“An assignment of error in a brief based on ‘mere assertion ’ and not supported by argument or authority is waived unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (citing State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. , )), aff’d
Pakou Lee-Barrios and o/b/o Minor Child v. Eric Joseph Vacko Below, Brittany Ann Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Midway, 306 Minn. at 356, d at 78; State v. Modern Recycling, 13 Inc., (holding that an assignment of error in a brief “based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorit [y] .
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Angela Swenson, f/k/a Dawn Angela Pedri v. Shawn Anthony Pedri, and County … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Molly Kathryn Sanders, joint-petitioner v. Johannes Moen, joint-petitioner Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. , (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.”); (deeming
In re the Marriage of: Wakisha Nicole Fortwengler, n/k/a Alexa Nicole Schultz v. Chad Michael Fortwengler Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Heather Lee Burke v. Thomas Joseph Burke, County of Otter Tail, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
Fulisha Fulmer v. Meridian Behavioral Health, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fulisha Fulmer v. Meridian Behavioral Health, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
State of Minnesota v. Tchad Tu Henderson 890 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Tchad Tu Henderson 890 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., -79 (Minn. 2015).
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Terry Torgerson v. Mark R. Hellerud, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Terry Torgerson v. Mark R. Hellerud, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (declining to reach issue that was not adequately briefed).
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State by Humphrey v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
Duluth Landfill Superior LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Duluth Landfill Superior LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
Rosevelt Beal v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rosevelt Beal v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (noting that assignment of error that is based on mere assertion and unsupported by argument or legal authority is waived unless prejudicial error is obvious).
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Moreover, “[a]n assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (quoting Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20, d 133, 135 (1971)).
Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
State of Minnesota v. George Barnard Crooks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. George Barnard Crooks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
Mohamed Yusuf v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 880 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohamed Yusuf v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 880 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
James Adam Roth v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James Adam Roth v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
State of Minnesota v. Dashaunta Dmar Gomez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dashaunta Dmar Gomez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.