Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11, 662 N.W.2d 125.

31 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
No. 11, 10 The rule providing for the appointment of a special master states that a “master must not have a relationship to the parties, counsel, action, or court that would require disqualification of a judge, unless the parties consent with the court’s approval to appointment of a particular person aft
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
Aaron Reimringer, Minn. 2021
No. 11 , Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational Church
A18-1953 A18-1958 A18-1959 A18-1960 A18-1961 Minn. 2021
No. 11, (noting that the use of the term “and” typically denotes a conjunctive rule).
Deborah Lynn Nichols, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Roller-Dick v. Centracare Health Sys. 916 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2018
A16-1612 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41310 899 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2017
In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41310 899 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2017
No. 11, (emphasis added).
J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 878 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2016
Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 875 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2016
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
No. 11, the care-and-support statute is unusual because it uses a conjunctive term in the context of a negative command.
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez 812 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez 812 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2012
State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
No. 11, (“interpretation of court rules presents a question of law”); M.M.
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines 768 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines 768 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
In Re QFC 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
In re Disciplinary Action Against Q.F.C. 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
In Re QFC 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
No. 11, (stating that the "scope and application" of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, as court rules, present a question of law that we review de novo).
In re Disciplinary Action Against Q.F.C. 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
No. 11, (stating that the “scope and application” of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, as court rules, present a question of law that we review de novo).
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006