Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate and Trust of Anderson, 654 N.W.2d 682.

31 citing documents.

In Re the Estate of Gregory S. MacDonald, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In Re. the Marriage of: Michelle Dorothea McKenna-Koziura v. Amy Nicole Koziura Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Anderson, (stating that an order may not be collaterally attacked after the appeal period has expired), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Estate of Jacob A Alderink, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Anderson, (affirming the denial of attorney fees to a beneficiary because her legal actions “would have been to her personal benefit as a beneficiary, for which section 524.3-720 does not allow reimbursement”), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Supervised Estate of Mary Catherine Swartout, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Mary Kristen Francis Revocable Trust Agreement Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Anderson, d 682, 686 (Minn. App. 2002), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Estate of: Donald J. Kellett, a/k/a Donald Jean Kellett, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
A22-0547 Brenda Legred, f/k/a Brenda Godlove v. Brent Legred (A22-0543), and The Estate of Darlene Legred, a/k/a Darlene … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Estate of Vernie Carl Payne, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Estate of: Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Second, in In re Estate & Trust of Anderson , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The primary purpose of construing a will is to discern the testator’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The primary purpose of construing a will is to discern the testator’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Estate of: Mitzi M. Olson, a/k/a Mitzi Marie Olson, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Estate of: Mitzi M. Olson, a/k/a Mitzi Marie Olson, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re: Estate of Deborah Ann Poire, a/k/a Debra A. Poire, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re: Estate of Deborah Ann Poire, a/k/a Debra A. Poire, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION I. Will provisions “The primary purpose of construing a will is to discern the testator’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court first examined the note, warranty deed, and mortgage to discern Barbara’s intent relating to the refinancing transaction.2 When attempting to ascertain Barbara’s intent, the district court did not consider the language in her will directing that her executor “pay all [her] legal debts.” The 5 687 (Minn. App. 2002) (construing documents together as part of an estate plan), review denie
In re the Estate of: Leonard J. Marihart, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Leonard J. Marihart, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver 783 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver 783 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In re Estate & Trust of Anderson
Gellert v. Eginton 770 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Gellert v. Eginton 770 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Supply Co. v. Estate of Shablow, 253 Minn. 1 , and contending that the cases hold that to receive an award of attorney fees under section 524.3-720, “the interested person” cannot personally benefit, along with the estate.
In Re Lyons Marital Trust 717 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Lyons Marital Trust 717 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
This court reviews a “district court’s construction of an unambiguous instrument de novo.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
ANALYSIS We “review a district court’s construction of an unambiguous instrument de novo.” (Minn.App.