Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate and Trust of Anderson, 654 N.W.2d 682.
-
, A25-1164
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Anderson, (affirming the denial of attorney fees to a beneficiary because her legal actions “would have been to her personal benefit as a beneficiary, for which section 524.3-720 does not allow reimbursement”), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
In re the Supervised Estate of Mary Catherine Swartout, Deceased.
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
- In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
In the Matter of the Mary Kristen Francis Revocable Trust Agreement.
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Anderson, d 682, 686 (Minn. App. 2002), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
Estate of: Donald J. Kellett, a/k/a Donald Jean Kellett, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
A22-0545 A22-0547
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
In re the Estate of Vernie Carl Payne, Deceased.
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Anderson, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
In the Matter of the Estate of: Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Second, in In re Estate & Trust of Anderson , review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The primary purpose of construing a will is to discern the testator’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The primary purpose of construing a will is to discern the testator’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In the Matter of the Estate of: Mitzi M. Olson, a/k/a Mitzi Marie Olson, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
In the Matter of the Estate of: Mitzi M. Olson, a/k/a Mitzi Marie Olson, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In re: Estate of Deborah Ann Poire, a/k/a Debra A. Poire, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
In re: Estate of Deborah Ann Poire, a/k/a Debra A. Poire, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION I. Will provisions “The primary purpose of construing a will is to discern the testator’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court first examined the note, warranty deed, and mortgage to discern Barbara’s intent relating to the refinancing transaction.2 When attempting to ascertain Barbara’s intent, the district court did not consider the language in her will directing that her executor “pay all [her] legal debts.” The 5 687 (Minn. App. 2002) (construing documents together as part of an estate plan), review denie
- In re the Estate of: Leonard J. Marihart, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
In re the Estate of: Leonard J. Marihart, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver 783 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver
783 N.W.2d 220
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In re Estate & Trust of Anderson
- Gellert v. Eginton 770 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
Gellert v. Eginton
770 N.W.2d 190
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Supply Co. v. Estate of Shablow, 253 Minn. 1 , and contending that the cases hold that to receive an award of attorney fees under section 524.3-720, “the interested person” cannot personally benefit, along with the estate.
- In Re Lyons Marital Trust 717 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
In Re Lyons Marital Trust
717 N.W.2d 457
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
This court reviews a “district court’s construction of an unambiguous instrument de novo.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
In Re Foley Trust
671 N.W.2d 206
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
ANALYSIS We “review a district court’s construction of an unambiguous instrument de novo.” (Minn.App.