Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., 456 N.W.2d 434.
-
Snowman Construction, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
-
In re the Matter of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc. , (quotation omitted); see also Hauschildt, d at 840 (noting that a central question is whether the two disputes arise from the same “group of operative facts” (quotation omitted)).
-
Cheryl M. Shega, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., (“Creating a new tort is a function properly reserved for the supreme court based upon appropriate facts and record.”); WL 4910852, at *7 (Minn. App. Dec.
-
Charlene Y. Latham, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
-
Ellen Louise Arnt, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc ., - 37 (Minn. 1990) (quotations and citations omitted).
-
, A18-1214, A18-1406
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., (quotation omitted).
-
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., -37 (Minn. 1990) (quoting Kmetz v. Johnson , ).
-
Teresa Thompson, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
-
Bradley Yde, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
-
In re the Estate of: Albert Garcia, Sr., Decedent
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., (quotation omitted) .
-
Dwaine C. Ratfield, Kathleen M. Ratfield, individually and as trustees of the Dwaine and Kathleen Ratfield Living Trust …
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., d 434, 439 (Minn. 1990).
-
Busad Kheyre, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc. , 8 (Minn. 1990).
- Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM)
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., (“Creating a new tort is a function properly reserved for the supreme court based upon appropriate facts and record.”).
- State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013
- Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
-
Miller v. Lankow
801 N.W.2d 120
Minn. 2011
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., (quoting County of Solano v. Delaney, 264 Cal.Rptr.
- Willis v. Indiana Harbor Steamship Co. 790 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Willis v. Indiana Harbor Steamship Co.
790 N.W.2d 177
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., -37 (Minn.1990) (quoting Kmetz v. Johnson, 261 Minn. 395, 401 , ).
- Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Foust v. McFairland
698 N.W.2d 24
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc., Minnesota does not recognize an independent spoliation tort.
- Wajda v. Kingsbury 652 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Wajda v. Kingsbury
652 N.W.2d 856
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
- Hoffman v. Ford Motor Co. 587 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Hoffman v. Ford Motor Co.
587 N.W.2d 66
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
- Patton v. Newmar Corp. 538 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1995
-
Patton v. Newmar Corp.
538 N.W.2d 116
Minn. 1995
Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
- Patton v. Newmar Corp. 520 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Patton v. Newmar Corp.
520 N.W.2d 4
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.
- Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1992
- Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1992