Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Morrisette v. Harrison International Corp., 486 N.W.2d 424.

54 citing documents.

Mike Baer v. Kelley Luckey F/K/A Kelley Baer, David Baer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Booker Construction Inc. v. Yolanda V Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Gary Frodermann v. C.J. Johnsrud, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’ l Corp.
Joey Gunderson v. Stanley M. Cowan, Jr., Amber Marotte, individual, Shauna Olson, et al., Toua Yang, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., (formation); H.P.
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., (stating that “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder”).
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
A23-0039 A23-0041 A23-0277 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
t court properly determined that it lacked the authority to enforce the purported settlement agreement.3 3 Though we need not reach Brent’s argument that the district court erred in determining that the parties did not reach a binding agreement during the mediation, we note that “The existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Smart Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Dean Suchy Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Id.; see Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
In re the Estate of: Roger D. Lewis, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
JanOne Inc., formerly known as Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. v. Skybridge Americas, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But, if in dispute, “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., see Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., (stating that “the interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact”).
Amanda Emele v. Felix Emele Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[T]he existence and terms of a contr act are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Aspen Builders and Remodelers, Inc. v. Shauna Raisch, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
TC Investment Group, LLC v. Christine King, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Constance Aguirre Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Although the existence and terms of a contract are questions of fact, Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp. , (Minn .
Khalif Jama, et al v. Saleban Garbiye, Amal Money Wire, LLC d/b/a Amal Express, et al., and Jamal … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(noting that appellate courts defer to dis trict court’ s opportunity to weigh and evaluate witness credibility); Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., (recognizing that “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder”).
Taofeek Ishola v. Lab Drugs & Medical-Trans-Supplies LLC, d/b/a Polar Pharmacy & Medical Supplies, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
GGG, Incorporation v. Jon T. Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[T]he existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder,” Morrisette v. Harrison Int ’l. Co., but “[t]he construction and effect of a contract are questions of law subject to de novo review by this court.” Logan v. Norwest Bank Minn ., 19 (Minn. App. 1999) ().
Laurie Jatho, et al v. Northeast Title Company Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
In re the Marriage of: Jill Nicole Prokop v. Christopher Jon Prokop Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[T]he existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Paul Stepnes v. Beth Trautman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The existence of a contract is a question of fact, Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp. , but summary judgment is appropriate if “a rational trier of fact could not find for the nonmoving party” based on the record as a whole
Fern Hill Place Retail Association, Inc. v. Fern Hill Place Homeowners Association, Inc., Cities Management, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[T]he existence and terms of a contra ct are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harri son Int’l Corp.
Hearing Associates, Inc. v. Dr. Sara Downs, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
If the parties dispute whether a contract exists, “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., d 424, 427 (Minn. 1992).
The Valspar Corporation v. Douglas T. Mueller, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[T]he existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When there is a dispute as to what is included within a contract, “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., (stating that “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder”); Minn. R. Civ.
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, et al., Charles Christie, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, et al., Charles Christie, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When in doubt, “the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael O’Byrne, et al v. Spring Valley Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael O’Byrne, et al v. Spring Valley Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If the parties dispute whether a contract exists, “the existence and 8 terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Morrisette v. Harrision Int’l Corp.
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The existence of a contract and its provisions are factual determinations, Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., but we interpret the meaning of those provisions de novo, Roemhildt v. Kristall Dev., Inc., review denied (Minn. July 19, 2011).
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Shuck 704 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Shuck 704 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“If in dispute, the existence and terms of a contract are questions for the fact finder.” Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp., (citation omitted).
Abrahamson v. Abrahamson 613 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Abrahamson v. Abrahamson 613 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Gresser v. Hotzler 604 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gresser v. Hotzler 604 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bruns v. City of St. Paul 555 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1996
Bruns v. City of St. Paul 555 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1996
Morrisette v. Harrison Int’l Corp.
Finke v. State 521 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Finke v. State 521 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by