Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stroud, 459 N.W.2d 332.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The decision whether to grant a continuance is within the [district] court’s discretion and will be reversed upon a showing that the [district] court abused its discretion.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The decision whether to grant a continuance is within the [district] court’s discretion and will be reversed upon a showing that the [district] court abused its discretion.”
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 71 (Minn. App. 2007) (reviewing a pretrial order suppressing a defendant’s confession to driving while under the influence and field sobriety test results); -35 (Minn. App. 1990) (reviewing a pretrial order suppressing DNA evidence linking the defendant to the charged criminal-sexual-conduct offense); (reviewing a pretrial order suppressing the gun that formed the basis for a charge of “felonious possession of a
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Clayton Douglas Groves, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Deiven Jacques Branch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-45 (Minn. App. 1993 ), aff’d, (mem.); -35 (Minn. App. 1990).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In arguing for its reconsideration request, in which this court determined the district court abused its discretion by refusing the state’s request for a continuance pending DNA results.
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Pierre Dortch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Pierre Dortch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Douglas John Olson 867 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Douglas John Olson 867 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Rhoads 802 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Rhoads 802 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Sime 669 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Sime 669 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(noting that DNA evidence can both inculpate and exculpate and may be valid reason for delay).
State, City of Crystal v. Kivi 554 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State, City of Crystal v. Kivi 554 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Johnson 498 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1993
State v. Johnson 498 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1993
On August 6, 1990, the state appealed the trial court’s ruling to the court of appeals, which, on September 21, 1990, (Minn.App.