Cited by

(“Even in the context of termination of parental rights, failure to raise constitutional issues in the district court precludes the issues from being raised on appeal.”).

557 (Minn. 1981) (declining to address a constitutional issue raised for the first time on appeal from a termination of parental rights); (concluding that a due-process argument in a TPR appeal was not properly before this court when the argument was not made before the district court); (stating that [e]ven in the context of termination of parental rights, failure to raise constitutional issues in the district court precluded the issues from being raised on appeal”).

“Even in the context of termination of parental rights, failure to raise constitutional issues in the district court precludes the issues from being raised on appeal.”

-56 (Minn. App. 1998), belies the language of the definition of egregious harm provided by the legislature.

-56 (Min n. App. 1998) (emphasi s added) (finding of egregious harm inflicted by father on child ’s half-sister was su fficient to support termination of father’s rights as to child).

(holding egregious harm to child in parent’s care sufficient to support termination of rights to different child in parent’s care).

Termination of parental rights based on egregious harm does “not requir[e] that the parent has inflicted egregious harm on his or her own child but, rather, that a child has experienced egregious harm in the parent’s care which demonstrates the parent’ s grossly inadequate ability to provide minimally adequate parental care to any child.” -56 (Minn. App. 1998).

- 56 (Minn. App. 1998) (holding that egregious harm experienced by child’s half-sister while in father’s care was sufficient grounds for terminating father’s parental rights to child).

1(b)(6); –56 (Minn. App. 1998) (holding that parental rights may be terminated to any child in the home if another child in the parent’s care has experienced egregious harm that shows the parent’s “grossly inadequate ability to provide minimally adequate care”).