Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Balenger, 667 N.W.2d 133.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Lawrence Jennings Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Weheliye Abdulcadir Abucar Gaal Minn. Ct. App. 2025
t even uncorroborated information provided by an anonymous informant may provide law- enforcement officers with the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigative stop if there is an “element of imminent danger,” on the ground that “officers receiving an anonymous tip that a person is armed are almost invariably justified in conducting an investigative stop.” 138 (Minn. App. 2003) (concluding that officer 27 had reasonable suspicion to stop pedestrian in crowd based on unidentified i
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review the validity of a Terry stop by applying a two-step inquiry: first, we consider “whether the stop was justified at its inception”; second, we consider whether the actions of the police during the stop “were reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the stop.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. B. M., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Instead, “common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Jesse Lee Helget (A20-1036) v. Commissioner of Public Safety, State of Minnesota, vs. Jesse Lee Helget (A22-0103) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Instead, “common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Brian Curtis Winge Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We are not persuaded otherw ise by the state’s review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Brenden Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2021
143, 146 , 92 S. Ct. 1921, 1923 (1972); (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 19- 20, 88 S. Ct. at 1879), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Jomar Londo Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2020
” State v. Balenger , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Brian John Blawat, et al., Floyd Blawat v. Ben Huener, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“There is no bright -line test separating a legitimate investigative stop from an unlawful arrest.” 18 review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Willie Alonso Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Balenger , (quotation and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Cornelius Palmer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(emphasis added) (quotation and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Ezel Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[T]he use of force reasonable under the circumstances will be permitted without a showing of probable cause when force is necessary for the protection of the investigating officers and the degree of force used [was] reasonable.” d 133, 139 (Minn. App. 2003) , review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Chakotay Bobbie Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Shelly Kay Karger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ultimately, the test is one of reasonableness, which requires balancing “the nature and degree of the intrusion on an individual’s Fourth Amendment rights against the government’s interest in crime prevention and legitimate concerns about the safety of law -enforcement officers.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anonymous tips that are “provided to police face to face are sufficiently reliable to justify an investigative stop, because the tipster puts himself in a position where his identity might be traced, and he might be held accountable for providing any false information.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Marco Allen Coney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marco Allen Coney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Nicholas James Heinz v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nicholas James Heinz v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Uncorroborated anonymous tips that are “provided to police face to face are sufficiently reliable to justify an investigative stop, because the tipster puts himself in a position where his identity might be traced, and he might be held accountable for providing any false information.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that the nature of an intrusion is balanced against the governmental interest in crime prevention and legitimate concerns of officer safety), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Michael James Parkin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael James Parkin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Anonymous tips that are “provided to police face to face are sufficiently reliable to justify an investigative stop, because the tipster puts himself in a 6 position where his identity might be traced, and he might be held accountable for providing any false information.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Timberlake 726 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Timberlake 726 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Oct.