DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Balenger, 667 N.W.2d 133.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    t even uncorroborated information provided by an anonymous informant may provide law- enforcement officers with the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigative stop if there is an “element of imminent danger,” on the ground that “officers receiving an anonymous tip that a person is armed are almost invariably justified in conducting an investigative stop.” 138 (Minn. App. 2003) (concluding that officer 27 had reasonable suspicion to stop pedestrian in crowd based on unidentified i
  • State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    We review the validity of a Terry stop by applying a two-step inquiry: first, we consider “whether the stop was justified at its inception”; second, we consider whether the actions of the police during the stop “were reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the stop.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
  • In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. B. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Instead, “common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
  • , A22-0103 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Instead, “common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    We are not persuaded otherw ise by the state’s review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    143, 146 , 92 S. Ct. 1921, 1923 (1972); (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 19- 20, 88 S. Ct. at 1879), review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    ” State v. Balenger , review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • Brian John Blawat, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “There is no bright -line test separating a legitimate investigative stop from an unlawful arrest.” 18 review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    State v. Balenger , (quotation and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    (emphasis added) (quotation and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “[T]he use of force reasonable under the circumstances will be permitted without a showing of probable cause when force is necessary for the protection of the investigating officers and the degree of force used [was] reasonable.” d 133, 139 (Minn. App. 2003) , review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    Ultimately, the test is one of reasonableness, which requires balancing “the nature and degree of the intrusion on an individual’s Fourth Amendment rights against the government’s interest in crime prevention and legitimate concerns about the safety of law -enforcement officers.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Anonymous tips that are “provided to police face to face are sufficiently reliable to justify an investigative stop, because the tipster puts himself in a position where his identity might be traced, and he might be held accountable for providing any false information.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota v. Marco Allen Coney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Marco Allen Coney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • Nicholas James Heinz v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Nicholas James Heinz v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Uncorroborated anonymous tips that are “provided to police face to face are sufficiently reliable to justify an investigative stop, because the tipster puts himself in a position where his identity might be traced, and he might be held accountable for providing any false information.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    (stating that the nature of an intrusion is balanced against the governmental interest in crime prevention and legitimate concerns of officer safety), review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota v. Michael James Parkin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Michael James Parkin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    Anonymous tips that are “provided to police face to face are sufficiently reliable to justify an investigative stop, because the tipster puts himself in a 6 position where his identity might be traced, and he might be held accountable for providing any false information.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State v. Timberlake 726 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Timberlake 726 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    review denied (Minn. Oct.