Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sigurdson v. Isanti County, 386 N.W.2d 715.

212 citing documents.

Sigurdson v. Carl Bolander & Sons, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1995
Sigurdson v. Carl Bolander & Sons, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1995
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 522 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 522 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ward v. Employee Development Corp. 516 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ward v. Employee Development Corp. 516 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-20 (Minn.1986) (McDonnell Douglas analysis allows prima facie case to be proved by indirect elements when direct evidence is not available).
Sigurdson v. Carl Bolander & Sons, Co. 511 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Sigurdson v. Carl Bolander & Sons, Co. 511 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. 512 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. 512 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
“This deference is especially strong in employment discrimination cases.” ().
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. Independent School District No. 624 509 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. Independent School District No. 624 509 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973) in cases involving circumstantial discrimination.
McGrath v. TCF BANK SAV., FSB 509 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1993
McGrath v. TCF BANK SAV., FSB 509 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1993
Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc. 509 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc. 509 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
“This deference is especially strong in employment discrimination cases.” ().
Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Bersie , the court stated that "the trial court, in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law, must explicitly apply the three-step McDonnell Douglas analysis.” Bersie, d at 145 ().
Butler v. Leadens Investigations & Security, Inc. 503 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Butler v. Leadens Investigations & Security, Inc. 503 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(citations and footnote omitted).
Huisenga v. Opus Corp. 494 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1992
Huisenga v. Opus Corp. 494 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1992
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. Clausen 491 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. Clausen 491 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1992
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1992
(requiring trial courts to explicitly apply McDonnell Douglas analysis in employment discrimination cases); (approving McDonnell Douglas analysis).
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 472 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1991
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 472 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1991
("trial court, in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law, must explicitly apply the three-step McDonnell Douglas analysis.”).
Miller v. Centennial State Bank 472 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Miller v. Centennial State Bank 472 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-22 (Minn.1986); (analysis first adopted).
LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French 460 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1990
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University 455 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Criticized State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University 455 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi 449 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi 449 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 448 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 448 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1989