Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees, 504 N.W.2d 751.

49 citing documents.

Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Minn. 2023
Ryan Lynch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Emps., (quotation omitted).
Richard W Bandimere, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. Stat. §§ 572B.23 -24 (2020); see also State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps.
Bennett & Koch Construction, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State, Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps., (quotation omitted).
Eric F. Netter, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
5 either law or fact in the absence of fraud, mistake in applying his own theory, misconduct, or other disregard of duty.” State, Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps., (quotation omitted).
Itasca County, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In th e absence of an agreement limiti ng an arbitrator’s authority, the arbitrator “is the final judge of both law and fact, including the interpretation of the terms of any contract.” State Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps., d 751, 754 (Minn. 1993) (quotation omitted).
Robbie Nelson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Special School District No.1, Minneapolis Public Schools, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State, Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps., (quotation omitted).
City of Duluth, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
City of Richfield v. Law Enforcement Labor Servs., Inc. 923 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2019
City of Richfield v. Law Enforcement Labor Servs., Inc. 923 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2019
754 (Minn. 1993) (quoting Cournoyer v. Am.
City of Richfield v. Law Enforcement Labor Servs., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
City of Richfield v. Law Enforcement Labor Servs., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
754 (Minn. 1993) (quotation omitted).
In re the Arbitration of: Katie Altenburg o/b/o Ian Altenburg, claimant, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State, Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps., -55 (Minn. 1993).
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Seagate I, d at 760-61 (noting that an arbitration award is final unless the arbitrator clearly acts beyond the scope of his or her authority); State v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof’l Emps., (“[An arbitrator’s] award will not be reviewed or set aside for mistake of either law or fact in the absence of fraud, mistake in applying his own theory, misconduct, or other disregard of duty.”) (citation omitted).
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Blaine Police Department of Blaine, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Blaine Police Department of Blaine, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he scope of judicial review of an arbitration award is extremely narrow.” State Office of State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof’l Employees
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao 854 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 2014
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corp. 834 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corp. 834 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State, Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof'l Employees (MAPE), (quotation omitted); see also Indep.
Abd Alla v. Mourssi 680 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Abd Alla v. Mourssi 680 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State, Office of State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof'l Employees
Wolfer v. Microboards Manufacturing, LLC 654 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wolfer v. Microboards Manufacturing, LLC 654 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Prof'l Employees, .
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Professional Employees, -55 (Minn.1993); David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Const., Inc.
City of Brooklyn Center v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 635 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
City of Brooklyn Center v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 635 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
at 2183 (citation and quotation marks omitted), quoted in State, Office of State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof'l Employees
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sankey 605 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sankey 605 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See State Auditor v. *414 Minnesota Ass’n of Prof'l Employees, -55 (Minn.1993) (review of arbitrator’s award is “extremely narrow” and confined to whether arbitrator exceeded powers).
Aaron v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 590 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Aaron v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 590 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hunter, Keith Indus., Inc. v. Piper Capital Management, Inc., (citing State, Office of State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof'l Employees, ).
Silva v. Maplewood Care Center 582 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1998
In Re the Arbitration Between Hunter, Keith Industries, Inc. v. Piper Capital Management Inc. 575 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Arbitration Between Hunter, Keith Industries, Inc. v. Piper Capital Management Inc. 575 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State, Office of State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof l Employees
Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821 568 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821 568 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Furthermore, “the scope of judicial review of an arbitration award is extremely narrow.” State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof'l Employees
In Re the Arbitration Between the City of Saint Paul v. AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508 567 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Arbitration Between the City of Saint Paul v. AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508 567 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof l Employees
City of Minneapolis v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 566 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
City of Minneapolis v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 566 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Prof'l Employees
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
State Office of State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass’n of Professional Employees
Independent School District No. 279 v. Winkelman Building Corp. 530 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 279 v. Winkelman Building Corp. 530 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Auditor v. Minn. Ass’n of Professional Employees, -55 (Minn.1993) (citations and quotations omitted) (emphasis in original).
Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pecora, Inc. v. Young 524 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pecora, Inc. v. Young 524 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Employees, (quoting Children’s Hosp., Inc. v. Minnesota Nurses Ass’n, ).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by