Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Senty-Haugen, 583 N.W.2d 266.
-
Joe Leko, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle Minn. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle
Minn. 2025
“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.” n.3 (Minn. 1998).
- Ken Martin v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, The Legal Marijuana Now Party, ... 6 N.W.3d 443 Minn. 2024
-
Ken Martin v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, The Legal Marijuana Now Party, ...
6 N.W.3d 443
Minn. 2024
2, notwithstanding the LMNP’s broad challenge to the constitutionality of sections 202A.12 and 202A.13 more generally.10 n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
Tyler Grant Thompson, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
-
Johnsonville, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 266, 269 n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”); see also Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of Eden Prairie, 456 F.3d 793, 801 (8th Cir. 2006) (holding that appellant lacked standing to 5 challenge sign-code provisions where pr
- Farm Bureau Financial Services, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Minn. 2020
n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
-
Julia Wang, d/b/a Orchid Massage Spa, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See In re Senty–Haugen, n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that cour ts should not reach constituti onal issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
-
In the Appeal of: SH RG For: Northstar Adoption Assistance
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
-
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton
903 N.W.2d 609
Minn. 2017
(noting that we will construe- statutes to avoid a constitutional confrontation, including “to avoid potential separation of powers problems”); , 269 n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
- In the Matter of the Massage and Bodywork License Application of Kim Yi's, LLC, and Yong Green d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In the Matter of the Massage and Bodywork License Application of Kim Yi's, LLC, and Yong Green d/b/a …
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See In re Senty–Haugen, n.3 (Minn. 1998) (“It is well- settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton
869 N.W.2d 60
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
269 n. 3 (Minn. 1998) ("It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise."); , 492-93 n. 7 (Minn.1988) (declining to reach due-process challenge to local rule providing for dismissal with prejudice because relief w
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, Appellant 862 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby
848 N.W.2d 515
Minn. 2014
269-70 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (noting that "[i]t is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise” and refusing to decide a constitutional issue because it had not been properly raised).
- In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
-
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince
847 N.W.2d 13
Minn. 2014
In we held that, in the absence of a statutory requirement for commitment to the least restrictive alternative, there was no error in failing to make findings of fact on the existence of such an alternative.
- State v. Rick 821 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Rick
821 N.W.2d 610
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(“Generally, we will not address a constitutional issue if there is another basis upon which the case can be decided.”); , 269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
-
Rickert v. State
795 N.W.2d 236
Minn. 2011
( , 732 n. 7 (Minn.2003)); , 269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (“It is well-settled law that the courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Brayton v. Pawlenty 781 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2010
-
Brayton v. Pawlenty
781 N.W.2d 357
Minn. 2010
269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (we avoid a constitutional ruling if there is another basis on which we may decide a case).
- State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
- State v. Jordan 742 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2007
- State v. Jackson 742 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 2007
- State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
State v. Richmond
730 N.W.2d 62
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
269-70 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (noting general practice is to avoid constitutional ruling if case can be decided on another basis).
- State v. Bourke 718 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Bourke
718 N.W.2d 922
Minn. 2006
We address Bourke’s statutory argument first because “[o]ur general practice is to avoid a constitutional ruling if there is another basis on which a case can be decided.” , 732 n. 7 (Minn.2003); , 269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- State v. Hartmann 700 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2005
- State v. Carter 697 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Carter
697 N.W.2d 199
Minn. 2005
(deferring the constitutional issue because conviction was reversed on other grounds); , 269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Irwin v. Goodno 686 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Irwin v. Goodno 686 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 683 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2004
-
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners
683 N.W.2d 303
Minn. 2004
269 n. 3 (Minn. 1998) ("It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
- Erlandson v. Kiffmeyer 659 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 2003
-
Erlandson v. Kiffmeyer
659 N.W.2d 724
Minn. 2003
269 n. 3 (Minn. *733 1998).
- Marriage of Svenningsen v. Svenningsen 641 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Svenningsen v. Svenningsen 641 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001