Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty, 388 N.W.2d 1.

21 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Julie Ann Schmidt, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Ronald Lee Henrichs, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Doherty v. Doherty , -3 (Minn. App. 1986).
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
15, 1989) ; Doherty v. Doherty , -2 & n.1 (Minn. App. 1986) (concluding district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding fixed -amount monthly maintenance plus fixed percentage of 12 income in excess of certain amount, but characterizing such award as disfavored and noting award may need to be capped if no longer responsive to part
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
9 -68 (Minn. App. 1989) ( affirming district court’s decision not to include 50% of future bonus compensation as spousal maintenance); Doherty v. Doherty , n.1 (Minn. App. 1986) (affirming award of spousal maintenance, but discouraging ongoing maintenance awards that include a base amount plus 50% of future taxable income) ; but see Novak v. Novak , d 64, 68 (Minn. App. 1987) (concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering bas
In re the Marriage of: Sheila L. Duhn, n/k/a Graff, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1; d 1, 2-3 (Minn. App. 1986).
In re the Marriage of: Barbara Ann Chadwick, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Thomas acknowledges that courts have expressed concern that a base-plus-a-percent maintenance award may lead to litigation in the future but correctly points out that the record contains no evidence suggesting that he has acted in bad faith or that he would fail to disclose financial informat
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
asure of income unless (1) it is impracticable to determine an obligor’s actual income or (2) the obli-gor’s actual income is unjustifiably self-limited.” Beede, d at 835 ; (affirming the use of earning capacity to determine spousal maintenance where it was impracticable to determine the obligor’s income); (affirming use of earning capacity to determine spousal maintenance where the district court found that obligor “had not been employed in good faith” for several months).
Marriage of McConnell v. McConnell 710 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of McConnell v. McConnell 710 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
30, 1987); (affirming a permanent-maintenance award when obli-gee submitted medical records that provided the trial court with substantial evidence regarding her health problems and was 55 years old, she had been involved in a long-term marriage, had outmoded job skills, and resided in an area with a limited job
Marriage of Bourassa v. Bourassa 481 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Bourassa v. Bourassa 481 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
2(g) (1986) (emphasis added); (where obligor spouse found not employed in good faith and to have artificially lowered his monthly income from $1,200-$1,-400 to $293, this court refused to alter monthly maintenance award of $500 plus 50% of net taxable income in excess of estimated earning capacity).
Marriage of McCulloch v. McCulloch 435 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of McCulloch v. McCulloch 435 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
To further her request for present division of respondent’s future bonuses, where the trial court awarded the wife permanent monthly maintenance of $500 plus 50% of husband’s income in excess of $14,000.
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 426 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Paul v. Paul 410 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Paul v. Paul 410 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(job market in area where recipient spouse resides is a factor).