Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Goins v. West Group, 635 N.W.2d 717.

75 citing documents.

JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
is limited to claims of sexual orientation discrimination under the MHRA related to employment.
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Daniel J. Keller v. Monumental Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Daniel J. Keller v. Monumental Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Mariam Aromashodu, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Concurring, Chutich, Thissen, JJ. Lori Dowling Hanson, Minn. 2022
Direct evidence establishes “that the employer’s discrimination was purposeful, intentional or overt,” “such as where an employer announces he will not consider females for positions,” Sigurdson v. Isanti County
Damon Doss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Howard Norsetter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Because we determine that the Twins have provided a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for not renewing Norsetter’s contract, the burden shifts to Norsetter to “put forward sufficient evidence to demonstrate that [the Twins] proffered explanation was a pretext for discrimination.”
Barbara Henry, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Scot A. Lacek, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
N.H., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018), may relief be granted when a school district requires a transgender boy to use locker-room facilities separate from the main boys’ locker -room facilities, ?
Assata Kenneh, Minn. 2020
We have held that discriminatory conduct “is not actionable unless it is ‘so severe or pervasive’ as to ‘alter the conditions of the [plaintiff’s] employment and create an abusive working environment.’ ” (quoting Meritor Sav.
Meagan Abel, Appellant, vs. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, et al., Respondents, St. Mary's University Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sarah Dickhausen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Vickie Apel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Assata Kenneh, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Nicole LaPoint, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“When a plaintiff alleges disparate treatment [under the MHRA], liability depends on whether the protected trait actually motivated the employer’s decision.” (emphasis added) ( quotation omitted).
Paul Allen Bray, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-24 (Minn. 2001); Friend v. Gopher Co., Inc.
LaFayette Temple, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Seraphin Abou, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
411 U.S. at 802, 93 S. Ct. at 1824
Jacquelyn Bliss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lapoint v. Orthodontics 892 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 2017
Lapoint v. Orthodontics 892 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 2017
the court stated that LaPoint had to prove that her pregnancy “actually motivated” Family Orthodontics’ decision not to hire her.
James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Courts have found direct evidence of discriminatory motive where a statement or policy is discriminatory on its face.”
Indira Y. Junghare v. The Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Indira Y. Junghare v. The Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Actions constituting a hostile work environment are not actionable unless the acts are “so severe or pervasive as to alter the conditions of the [plaintiff’s] employment and create an abusive working environment.” (quotations omitted).
Mary Jo Delaney v. Cragun Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mary Jo Delaney v. Cragun Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[P]roof of a discriminatory motive may be established by direct evidence.”
Charles Pearson v. Rohn Industries, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Charles Pearson v. Rohn Industries, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-24 (Minn. 2001); review denied (Minn. Nov.
Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A. 872 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A. 872 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
see also Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., Inc., (holding that the protected trait must be “a substantial causative factor”).
Robert L. Eggerichs v. The Auto Club Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert L. Eggerichs v. The Auto Club Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey P. Kirk v. State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey P. Kirk v. State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pat Ritter v. Auntie Ruth's Animal Care and Wellness, Inc. d/b/a Auntie Ruth's Furry Friends Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pat Ritter v. Auntie Ruth's Animal Care and Wellness, Inc. d/b/a Auntie Ruth's Furry Friends Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 817 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 817 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(citing Carter v. Chrysler Corp., 173 F.3d 693, 700 (8th Cir.1999)).
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
LaMont v. Independent School District 728 814 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2012