Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Williamson v. Prasciunas, 661 N.W.2d 645.

34 citing documents.

Jerome E. Johnson v. Stacy A. Bee, Cheryl Steele Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Wrongfully refusing to deliver property on demand by the owner constitutes conversion.” (quotation omitted).
Maria Olson, et al v. City of Cambridge, et al., Jay T. Squires, Lisa Iverson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Maria Olson, et al v. City of Cambridge, et al., Jay T. Squires, Lisa Iverson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(explaining that a statute of limitations is tolled if the defendant fraudulently concealed a cause of action).
Janet C. Dreyer, et al v. Reierson Construction, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
And a property owner may testify about the market value of property without any particular foundation being laid, Vreeman v. Davis , but “that rule must be subject to some limitation where the owner of the property is wholly incredible.” Hous.
Roger Dean Olson v. Michael J. Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jonathan G. Foss v. Mark Scott Savage, Susan Foss, et al., Third Party Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2023
return of his contributions plus interest while Savage would enjoy all the stock purchased with Foss’s funds.” Conversion A person commits the conversion tort when they “willfully interfere[] with the personal property of another without lawful justification, depriving the lawful possessor of 14 use and possession.” Staffing Specifix, d at 125 ().
James L. Lang v. Craig Bjorklund, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To make a valid claim of fraudulent concealment sufficient to toll the statute of limitations, the plaintiff must show that (1) the defendant made a statement or statements that concealed the potential cause of action, (2) “the statement or statements were intentionally false,” and (3) “the concealment could not have been discovered by reasonable diligence.” Williamson v. Prasciunas
RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al v. Northwestern Orthopaedic Surgeons Partnership, LLP, a Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Travis Colsen v. Bright Birch, Inc. d/b/a Bright Birch Real Estate and d/b/a Bright Birch, a Minnesota corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The tort of conversion occurs when a pe rson “willfully interferes with the personal property of another without lawful justification depriving the lawful possessor of use and possession.” Williamson v. Prasciunas , (quotations omitted).
Penelope Isleman, et al v. Public Storage Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Conversion occurs when a person “willfully interferes with the personal property of another without lawful justification depriving the lawful possessor of use and possession.” (quotations omitted).
John Mullaney v. University of St. Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Williamson v. Prasciunas , (M inn.
Gary Tank v. Caleb Krusemark Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-49 (Minn. App. 2003), the defendants admittedly converted Williamson’s jewelry and later returned it.
William Miller v. Public Storage, a foreign Real Estate Investment Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The tort of conversion has two elements: “(1) plaintiff holds a property interest; and (2) defendant deprives plaintiff of that interest.”
Twin Town Properties, LLC v. Mark Janavaras a/k/a Markos Janavaras d/b/a General J’s Military Surplus Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Conversion occurs where one willf ully interferes with the pers onal property of another without lawful justification, depriving the lawful possessor of use and possession.” (quotations omitted).
Patrick Takuanyi, et al v. Center National Bank, N.A., Advanced Recovery Solutions, LLC, Dynasty Motors, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Conversion occurs where one willfully interferes with the 4 personal property of another without lawful justification, depriving the lawful possessor of use and possession.” (quotations omitted).
Timothy Boldt v. Mike’s Electrical Central MN, LLC, d/b/a Mike’s Electric Minn. Ct. App. 2017
see Williamson v. Prasciunas , (Mi nn.
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Conversion occurs when a person “willfully interferes with the personal property of another without lawful justification, depriving the lawful possessor of use and possession.” (quotations omitted).
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
679, 679 (1904) (furniture); (jewelry); Bates, d at 681 (vehicle).
David B. Markle, et al v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David B. Markle, et al v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The elements of common law conversion are: (1) plaintiff holds a property interest; and (2) defendant deprives plaintiff of that interest.”
Joseph W. Frederick v. Kay L. Wallerich, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joseph W. Frederick v. Kay L. Wallerich, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Fraudulent concealment occurs in an attorney-client relationship when “there was an affirmative act or statement which concealed a potential cause of action, that the statement was known to be false * * *, and that the concealment could not have been discovered by reasonable diligence.” (citing Herrmann, d at 641; review denied (Minn. Aug.
Christopher C. Mogren v. Gregory Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Christopher C. Mogren v. Gregory Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Conversion occurs where one willfully interferes with the personal property of another without lawful justification, depriving the lawful possessor of use and possession.” (quotation omitted).
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Karla Coltrain v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Karla Coltrain v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “when the nonmoving party bears the burden of proof on an element essential to the nonmoving party’s case, the nonmoving party must make a showing sufficient to establish that essential element.” Russ, d at 71 (citation omitted); (“A mere argument .
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2007