Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hawanchak, 669 N.W.2d 912.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Where there is no record of a defendant’s waiver of counsel, it is impossible to determine upon appellate review whether a waiver was knowing and intelligent.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 2012), and it is the district court’s duty to ensure these constitutional requirements are met
- A22-1093 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that “a denial of the right to counsel does not require a showing of prejudice to obtain reversal.”).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Albert Silas Garner, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Albert Silas Garner, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
State v. Maddox
825 N.W.2d 140
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
impossible to determine upon appellate review whether a waiver was knowing and intelligent.” , 904 n. 6 (Minn.1983) (noting that generally “[a] waiver of ...
- State v. Jones 755 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
State v. Jones
755 N.W.2d 341
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
held that the district court violated the defendant’s right to counsel by requiring him to proceed pro se without obtaining a written waiver of the right to counsel or making a record establishing a refusal of counsel.
- State v. Garibaldi 726 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Garibaldi 726 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Kouba 709 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
State v. Kouba
709 N.W.2d 299
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(reversing disorderly conduct and fifth-degree assault conviction where defendant’s right to counsel violated); Murray, d at 455 (reversing probation revocation where defendant not advised of right to counsel); (decision to revoke