Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ronnkvist v. Ronnkvist, 331 N.W.2d 764.

83 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The district court’s valuation of an asset “should be supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the [district] court.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The valuation of an asset “should be supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the [district] c ourt.”
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
see also Doering, d at 129 (explaining that caselaw indicates “that the failure of a party to a dissolution to make a full and complete disclosure constitutes sufficient reason to reopen the dissolution judgment for fraud”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Minn. 2022
See Maranda, d at 165; –66 (Minn. 1983) (“[P]arties to a martial dissolution proceeding have a duty to make a full and accurate disclosure of all assets and liabilities to facilitate the trial court's property distribution.”).
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Alan Fish, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-66 (Minn. 1983); review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Michael Dennis Dewar, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Ronnkvist v. Ronnkvist , (noting that a district court’s valuation of an asset “should be supported by either clear documentary or testi monial evidence or by comprehensive findings”); (determining that valuation award was arbitrary where district court fail
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
District courts have broad discretion in the valuation of an asset, but that discretion is not unlimited, and the valuation “should be supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings.” d 764, 766 (Minn. 1983).
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Larry Joe Bolton v. Susan Mary Bolton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Larry Joe Bolton v. Susan Mary Bolton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Doering v. Doering 629 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Doering v. Doering 629 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(stating breach of the duty of parties to a dissolution to make full and *130 accurate disclosure constitutes fraud sufficient to set aside the judgment); Hafner v. Hafner, 237 Minn. 424, 432 , (holding that the confidential relationship between a husband and wife imposes a d
Marriage of Sanborn v. Sanborn 503 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Sanborn v. Sanborn 503 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-66 (Minn.1983); see also Maranda, d at 165 .
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
quoted in Letsch, d at 242 .
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
-66 (Minn.1983), this court stated that parties to a marital dissolution have a duty to make a full and accurate disclosure of all assets and liabilities to facilitate the trial court’s property distribution.
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 435 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 412 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 412 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Smith v. Smith 410 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Smith v. Smith 410 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The valuation should, however, be “supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.”
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 407 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 407 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
[HJowever a trial court’s decision must be supported “by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.” ().
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The valuation should, however, be “supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.”
Marriage of Tasker v. Tasker 395 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Tasker v. Tasker 395 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-66 (Minn.1983) states: The general rule is that parties to a marital dissolution proceeding have a duty to make a full and accurate disclosure of all assets and liabilities to facilitate the trial court’s property distribution.
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court’s exercise of its discretion in valuing and distributing an asset “should be supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.”
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
It is well established that a trial court’s discretion “is not unlimited and should be supported by clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.” ().
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 379 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Greer v. Greer 379 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 379 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986