Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Goodridge, 352 N.W.2d 384.

39 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. James Henry Maxwell Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This law applies when multiple convictions are “for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.”
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Haeska Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This law applies when multiple convictions are “for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.”
Tyler Douglas Flantz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
tutes sections 609.04 and 609.035.1 We disagree and conclude that neither statutory prohibition applies because Flantz admitted tha t the images corresponding to count s four and five depicted two different children .2 Section 609.04 prohibits a district court from convicting a defendant “twice for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.” State v. Goodridge , .
Lannon Lavar Burdunice v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(discussing section 609.04).
State of Minnesota v. William Arnold Lindeman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Under section 609.04, “a defendant can not be convicted twice for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.” State v. Goodridge , (emphasis added).
State v. Lopez-Ramos 913 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Lopez-Ramos 913 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
679 F.3d 1131 , 1140 (9th Cir. 2012) ; see also State v. Goodridge , , 388 n.2 (Minn. 1984) ("[A] party cannot object to his failure to have a chance to cross-examine himself.").
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Cheng Pao Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cheng Pao Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Based on that statute, “a defendant cannot be convicted twice for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.”
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
§ 609.05 (1994); State v. Matousek, 287 Minn. 344
Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1994
Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1994
This *533 -87 (Minn.1984): During the evening of November 19, 1982, defendant [Goodridge] socialized with three friends—Mitchell Pierce [sic-Peirce], Leland Mark Hoagland and Troy Palthen.
State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
-88 (Minn.1984), -02 (Minn.1980).
Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Under the law, “person[s] may be held criminally liable as an aider and abettor without actively participating in the overt act constituting the primary offense; moreover, criminal intent may be inferred from * * * conduct before and after the offenses are committed.” (emphasis added); (holding corporate officer liable as aider and abettor in filing of false reports even though reports were not authorized or approved of by officers).
State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
State v. England 409 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. England 409 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“[Cjriminal intent may be inferred from presence, companionship and conduct before and after the offenses are committed.”
State v. Vance 392 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Vance 392 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Weaver 386 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Weaver 386 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Under section 609.04, “a defendant cannot be convicted twice for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.” (emphasis added).
State v. O'BRIEN 364 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. O'BRIEN 364 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“Under section 609.-04, a defendant cannot be convicted twice for the same offense against the same victim on the basis of the same act.”
State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985