Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kahn, 555 N.W.2d 15.

36 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Alexandra Jean Phillippi Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“ Probable cause exists if an affidavit sets forth competent evidence sufficient to lead a reasonably prudent person to believe there is a basis for the search,” meaning that there is a fair probability that evidence of a crime will be found in a certain location
State of Minnesota v. Shane Maurice McPike Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 15, 19 (Minn. App. 1996).
State of Minnesota v. Bret Ryne Lott Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We are not persuaded otherwise by the case cited by Lott—
State of Minnesota v. Breanna Rae Enno Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the second opinion, the appellant was arrested for possessing cocaine on his person when he was “75 to 85 miles away” from his home.
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Cf. Souto, d at 748-49 (determining that the affidavit “failed to establish a sufficient nexus” to defendant’s home where the affidavit “did not indicate that [defendant] ever arranged drug deals, sold, or distributed drugs, much less that she performed such acts from her home”); d 15, 18 (Minn. App. 1996) (declining to find “a reasonable nexus” between defendant’s “possession of one ounce of cocaine in Minneapolis” and “possible evidence or contraband at his residence 75 to 85 miles away” (emph
State of Minnesota v. Bobby Dawkins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. John Edward Yort Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, (concluding that possession of one ounce of cocaine 75 to 85 miles from the defendant’s home did not establish a nexus to the defendant’s home sufficient for issuance of a warrant).
State of Minnesota v. Machelle Jean Frisbie Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Oscar Barrios-German Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dr. Jonathan Peterson v. Ruth Martinez, in her Official Capacity, et al., The Professional Renewal Center Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Airports Comm’n, d 15 322, 323 (Minn. App. 1996).
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Brenda Kay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
13, 2000), in support of her argument.
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jason Yankovec Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jason Yankovec Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Yankovec argues that this information was legally insufficient to establish probable cause to issue a search warrant
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (holding that no probable cause was established to search a defendant’s residence when the supporting affidavit did not allege that the defendant ever arranged, sold, or distributed drugs, including from her home); –19 (Minn. App. 1996) (holding that the issuing judge lacked probable cause to issue a warrant to search a defendant’s home when he had been 8 previously arrested for possessing one ounce of cocaine, an amount that an officer knew through training and experience was
State v. Yarbrough 828 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Yarbrough 828 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
See Souto, d at 749 (concluding that information in the affidavit failed to establish a sufficient nexus between any purported drug dealing in the area and the defendant’s home); (holding that there was not probable cause for the search of the defendant’s residence because the warrant application lacked any “evidence linking [defendant’s] alleged possession in Minneapolis and the likelihood of evidence or contraband being found at his residence 75 to 85 miles away”).
State v. Brennan 674 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Brennan 674 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Souto, d at 749 (holding that law-enforcement affiant’s statement that “he knew” defendant was involved in possession and distribution of drugs “was too vague and conelusory” to support finding of probable cause); Kahn, (holding that issuing judge did not have probable cause to issue warrant to search defendant’s home where defendant’s arrest for possession of one ounce of cocaine occurred 75 to 85 miles from his home); Secord, 1 review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(search warrant application citing information acquired by other officer from different agency).
State v. Secord 614 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Secord 614 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Search Warrant of Columbia Heights v. Rozman 586 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Search Warrant of Columbia Heights v. Rozman 586 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(holding purpose of affidavit supporting warrant application is to allow magistrate to independently determine whether probable cause exists to support issue a warrant).
State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Bynum 579 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Bynum 579 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Martinez 579 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Martinez 579 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1998