48407
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Welfare of C. M. S.
State v. Welfare of C. M. S., 268 N.W.2d 76 (Minn. 1978).
Cited by
Distinguished in 5 Criticized in 1
- State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Lopez Bibiano Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Michael Everson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. I. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Leigh Stevens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Thomas Herrera Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Khaaliq Sayyed Rakim Dotson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Guillermo Lenin Huaman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Francisco Aplicano-Ramos Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Drew Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jesus Nava Carranza Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: R. A. C., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Tirson Lamberty Castro Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Mathison 263 N.W.2d 61
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by the state from a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant which contained no address. The relevant facts of the present case are virtually indistinguishable from those of State v. Mathison, 263 N.W.2d 61 (Minn.1978). Because this case is squarely controlled by the Mathison decision, the order suppressing the evidence is affirmed. Respondent is allowed $400 attorneys fees. Affirmed.