Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northwestern College v. City of Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865.

129 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of Andrew Wheeler for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2026
ROA Rochester, LLC v. City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rosalie Miller, et al v. City of White Bear Lake, Kenneth B. MacDonald, Ann T. MacDonald Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Dan Murphy v. City of Minneapolis, Beard Manager, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Mike and Kristina Herbst, et al v. City of Deephaven, a Minnesota municipal corporation, M.T. Laught L.L.C., a … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1103 4th St SE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. City of Minneapolis, a Minnesota municipal corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2022
For that reason, we are unpersuaded by relator’s supports its position.
John Schulz, et al v. Town of Duluth, Carol Danielson-Bille Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. City of Arden Hills, see also C.R.
Almir Puce v. City of Burnsville, MN Minn. Ct. App. 2022
On a ppeal from a district court’s review of a municipality’s zoning decision, this c ourt reviews the municipality’s decision “independent of the findings and conclusions of the district court.” see also C.R.
Croix Holdings, LLC v. City of Newport Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. City of Arden Hills, (quotation omitted).
Peter Stalland, et al v. City of Scandia Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. City of Arden Hills, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Application of United States Solar Corporation and USS Water Fowl Solar LLC for … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
LeRoy J. Rossow, Jr. v. The City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
(stating that this court, not the district court, should independently review a city council’s zoning decision and concluding that the denial of a building permit was “arbitrary”).
Bio Wood Processing, LLC v. Rice County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bio Wood Processing, LLC v. Rice County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(requiring a zoning ordinance to “operate uniformly on those similarly situated”).
Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, et al v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners, Minnesota-Iowa Baptist Conference Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, et al v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners, Minnesota-Iowa Baptist Conference Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. City of Arden Hills, (“Although neighborhood sentiment may be taken into consideration in any zoning decision, it may not constitute the sole basis for granting or denying a given permit.”).
Goerke Family Partnership, Donald Shelstad, et al v. Lac qui Parle-Yellow Bank Watershed District, William Croatt 857 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Goerke Family Partnership, Donald Shelstad, et al v. Lac qui Parle-Yellow Bank Watershed District, William Croatt 857 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Vigstol, et al v. Isanti County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Vigstol, et al v. Isanti County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Connaughty v. Winona County Board of Commissioners 849 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Connaughty v. Winona County Board of Commissioners 849 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka 783 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2010
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka 783 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2010
In support of the application of this standard, the court of appeals cited Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 289-90 , , 868 n. 4 (Minn. 1979).
Bartheld v. County of Koochiching 716 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bartheld v. County of Koochiching 716 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Yeh v. County of Cass 696 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Yeh v. County of Cass 696 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Town of Grant, d at 717 ().
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church 672 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church 672 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 667 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2003
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 667 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2003
Thomas from the restrictions of historic designation but imposed those restrictions [on BGEA].” It is well established that “[a] zoning ordinance must operate uniformly on those similarly situated.”
Schwardt v. County of Watonwan 656 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2003
Schwardt v. County of Watonwan 656 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2003
Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park 643 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park 643 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 290-91 , -20 (1973)
Kismet Investors, Inc. v. County of Benton 617 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kismet Investors, Inc. v. County of Benton 617 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 293 , (affirming variances from setback requirements, parking requirements, and maximum number of apartment units), overruled, Arcadia Dev.
Nolan v. City of Eden Prairie 610 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Nolan v. City of Eden Prairie 610 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 291 , overruled on other grounds, , 868 n. 4 (Minn.1979).
Graham v. Itasca County Planning Commission 601 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Graham v. Itasca County Planning Commission 601 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 292 , (“substantial evidence in this case [demonstrates] that sufficient practical difficulties existed to justify” variances)
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Corwine v. Crow Wing County, 309 Minn. 345, 361 , (noting status as area residents is sufficient “to establish competency and personal knowledge” of many alleged facts), St.
Kottschade v. City of Rochester 537 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1995