Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eakman v. Brutger, 285 N.W.2d 95.

66 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Tanya Mae Wagner, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
see Cherne Indus., d at 17 91 (“The granting of an injunction generally rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and its action will not be disturbed on appeal unless, based upon the whole record, it appears that there has been an abuse of such discretion.”).
Jessica Hagen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Minn. 2021
but must present specific facts showing that there is an issue for trial on the merits.” Eakman v. Brutger , (“ It is incumbent on the party opposing a summary judgment motion made on depositions or affidavits to counter with sufficient specific facts to raise a jury issue.”).
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State, Minn. 2020
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship , see Eakman v. Brutger , (“The sole issue on appeal [fr om an order denying a temporary injunction] is whether there was a clear abuse of .
Lance Gerald Milliman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 638 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 638 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners 525 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners 525 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rexton, Inc. v. State 521 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rexton, Inc. v. State 521 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 512 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 512 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
City of Rochester v. Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n 505 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rochester v. PEOPLES CO-OP. POWER ASS'N 505 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
City of Rochester v. Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n 505 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(issues not raised below may not be considered on appeal).
Rochester v. PEOPLES CO-OP. POWER ASS'N 505 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(issues not raised below may not be considered on appeal).
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis 502 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1993
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis 502 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1993
Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Grounds & Assocs., Inc.
Valenty v. Medical Concepts Development, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
White v. Winona State University 474 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
White v. Winona State University 474 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Morse v. City of Waterville 458 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Morse v. City of Waterville 458 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Ex Rel. Drabik v. Martz 451 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Ex Rel. Drabik v. Martz 451 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Dodge v. Cedar-Riverside Project Area Committee 443 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Dodge v. Cedar-Riverside Project Area Committee 443 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Empire State Bank of Cottonwood v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Empire State Bank of Cottonwood v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Oxford Development Minnesota, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 428 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Oxford Development Minnesota, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 428 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Parsons v. Parsons 413 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Parsons v. Parsons 413 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
56.05; it is questionable whether the trial court should have relied upon Ricke’s unsworn denial.
Krueger v. Washington Federal Savings Bank of Montevideo 406 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Krueger v. Washington Federal Savings Bank of Montevideo 406 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 394 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 394 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The sole issue on appeal is whether there was a clear abuse of such discretion.”
Marriage of Linder v. Linder 391 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Linder v. Linder 391 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gonzales v. Hollins 386 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gonzales v. Hollins 386 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty 383 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty 383 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
M.G.M. Liquor Warehouse International, Inc. v. Forsland 371 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 371 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1985

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by