Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bertsch, 707 N.W.2d 660.
-
State of Minnesota v. Leslie Nicole Moore
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Kevin Kris Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Kris Christensen
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
And an appellate court “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota v. Tirson Lamberty Castro
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The inquiry into whether two offenses are separate criminal acts is analogous to an inquiry into whether multiple offenses constituted a single behavioral incident under Minn. Stat. § 609.035.” .
-
State of Minnesota v. Leo Alf Curtis
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Kayne Johnston
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
And an appellate court “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure.” .
-
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lester Caldwell, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In determining whether an offense is an “included 16 offense” under section 609.04, courts examine “the elements of the offense instead of the facts of the particular case.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Glen Alvin Johnson
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In determining whether an offense is an “included offense” under section 609.04, courts examine “the elements of the offense instead of the facts of the particular case.”
- State of Minnesota v. Allan Kingsley Kerr Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Dagan Michael Lasart, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Lee Murray
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.3.a(7) (2020)
- State of Minnesota v. Jill Marie Zetterwall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jill Marie Zetterwall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Donnie Ray Bryant Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Donnie Ray Bryant Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that this court will rarely disturb a district court’s decision to impose a sentence within the presumptive guidelines range).
- State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-Bond Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 412, 417-18 (Minn. 2017)
- State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-Bond Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Lee Berry Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Lee Berry Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Dennis Anthony Bradley Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Ryan Adam Burbul Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Brandon Maurice Baker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Keith Alan Powelson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Keith Alan Powelson
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 660, 668 (Minn. 2006) (an appellate court “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure”) (quotation omitted)); (“the mere fact tha
- State of Minnesota v. Jessica Ann Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Vin Khumpavong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Vin Khumpavong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Bunes Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Marcell Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Calvin Edward Bartz Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Treymane Weston
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1(4), we “examine[] the elements of the offense instead of the facts of the particular case.” (emphasis added).
-
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Allen Owens, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.3.a(7) (2020)
- Todd Deon Rolack v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Todd Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Lee Sanders
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
666 (Minn. 2006) (reviewing “district court’s implicit determination that .
- State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Peter Jay Engen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Antonio Levell Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Samuel Lee Griffith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Tashawn Antionette Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Jared Devlin Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Sean William Roulo
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An offense is a lesser-included offense “if it is impossible to commit the greater offense without committing the lesser offense.”