Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ramey, 721 N.W.2d 294.
- State of Minnesota v. Deandre Dontae Turner Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Deandre Dontae Turner Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Russell James Bankey
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious” and is typically established where the prosecutor’s conduct “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of 4 conduct.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Andy Joseph Hedlund Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Deondre Demetrius Ramsey
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
B. Unobjected-to Prosecutorial Misconduct If the defendant does not object during trial, we “review the prosecutor’s statements under a modified plain error analysis.” (-300, 302 (Minn. 2006)).
- State of Minnesota v. Dustin Brock Metcalfe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Brock Metcalfe
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
5 For unobjected-to prosecutorial misconduct, “[w]e review the prosecutor’s statements under a modified plain error analysis.” (-300, 302 (Minn. 2006)).
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy Lee Heller Minn. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Lee Heller
Minn. 2024
An error is plain if it is “clear or obvious,” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted), meaning the error “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Larry Rucker
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 294, 299-300 (Minn. 2006) .
- State of Minnesota (A23-1698) (A23-1811) v. Cathy Olvera Sanchez (A23-1698) (A23-1811) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Clinton Albert Christopher Juring
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Olabamidele Olumide Bewaji Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Manuel Richard Buck Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Gary Phipps Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Jamie Sara Schmeichel
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Schmeichel has the burden to “demonstrate both that error occurred and that the error was plain.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Marlon Curtis
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(jury instructions); (prosecutorial misconduct).
- State of Minnesota v. Aaron Joseph Shea Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of S. D. G., Child
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
n.6 (Minn. 2006); -87 (Minn. 2011) (explaining the supreme court’s “inherent judicial authority”).
- State of Minnesota v. Brian Harry Kjellberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Reymundo Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Reymundo Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Ruben Perez-Robles Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Cory Gene Dustan Lutz
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
If we determine a plain error affected the appellant’s substantial rights, then we assess “whether the error should be addressed to ensure fairness and the integrity of the judicial proceedings.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdirashid Mohamed
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
gave in 5 We note that the supreme court has “le[ft] for another day the question of whether the Caron two-tiered approach should continue to apply to cases involving objected-to prosecutorial misconduct.” n.4 (Minn. 2006).
- State of Minnesota v. Frank James Bigbear Minn. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Frank James Bigbear
Minn. 2024
(“Prosecutors have an affirmative obligation to ensure that a defendant receives a fair trial, no matter how strong the evidence of guilt.”).
- A23-0588 Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Antoine Darnique Suggs Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Courtney Deshaun Hall
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Because Hall did not object to the state’s closing argument, we “review the prosecutor’s statements under a modified plain error analysis.” d 716, 726 (Minn. 2022) (–300, 302 (Minn. 2006)).
- State of Minnesota v. Glen Alvin Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Tracey Dee Keyes
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” ().
-
Sheila Maurise Burski v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it ‘contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” ().
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy Allen Amacher Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Xavier Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. William Kenneth Pike
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious,” which generally “is shown if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Price Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Price Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Jermaine Chamberlain Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Peter Joseph Nayquonabe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Edbin Jose Coreas Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Edbin Jose Coreas Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Peter Joseph Nayquonabe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Jermaine Chamberlain Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Marcus Samuel Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Mickela Joy Vredenburg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Mickela Joy Vredenburg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Marcus Samuel Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Arnold Westrom 6 N.W.3d 145 Minn. 2024