Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Suhon, 742 N.W.2d 16.

30 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey William Boysen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
charged in separate counts covering different segments of the victim’s childhood is not a single behavioral incident.” -23 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Frank John Rakowiecki Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Frank John Rakowiecki Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 257, 265-67 (Minn. 2020) (holding that two instances of child sexual abuse against the same victim that occurred at separate times were not part of a single behavioral incident); (concluding that three offenses of child sexual abuse that occurred “in many different rooms and at different times” did not constitute a single behavioral incident), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Chad Edward Danberry Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Steven Eric Doan-Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-20 (Minn. App. 2007), where the defendant was convicted of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and one count of third- degree criminal sexual conduct for abusing his daughter 6 The details of J.D.H.’s convictions, plea agreement, and sentence are not included in this record.
State of Minnesota v. Servando Suarez Rivera Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Thus, “even assuming that [Suarez Rivera] committed each sexual act ‘to satisfy his sexual urges, the mere fact that he committed multiple crimes over 3 Suarez Rivera also argues that the complaint improperly included the same offense-date range for these two counts and maintains that each offense must relate to a “distinct timeframe within [a] long period,”
State of Minnesota v. Clinton Albert Christopher Juring Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Chad Edward Danberry Minn. Ct. App. 2023
For example, in State v. Suhon, this court considered “sex abuse” against a single victim that occurred “on a regular basis.” rev. denied (Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Brian Arthur Barthman Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-20, 24-25 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Mark Airen Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-20 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Andre Joseph Shafer Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Adolfo Gutierrez Avila, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Mario Pedro Moreno Minn. Ct. App. 2019
17 review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Salahalldeen Avdil Hamad Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Multiple acts against the same victim do not constitute a single beha vioral incident when the individual acts are separated by time and place.” State v. Suhon , , review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Paul Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2018
For example, in State v. Suhon, the defendant sexually abused his adopted daughter for ten years—a time period we determined was too protracted to amount to a single behavioral inciden t. review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Barthman 917 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Barthman 917 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Suhon , , 25 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Howard Nordquist Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“When a single behavioral incident results in the violation of multiple criminal statutes, the offender may be punished only for the most severe offense.” State v. Suhon , review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel A. Maldonado Zepeda Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Scott Marlin Morey Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Multiple acts against the same victim do not constitute a single behavioral incident when the individual acts are separated by time and place.” 24 (Minn. App. 2007) (affirming multiple sentences for sexual assault by defendant against his minor child over a period of 11 years), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Jeannie Frances Ball Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeannie Frances Ball Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Inconsistencies 4 in prosecution evidence do not require reversal.”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Spidel Wayne Browder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Spidel Wayne Browder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[i]nconsistencies in the state’s case are not grounds for reversing the jury verdict.” d 16, 20 (Minn. App. 2007) (“Inconsistencies in prosecution evidence do not require reversal.”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Emmanuel Maurice Galloway Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Emmanuel Maurice Galloway Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We have previously held that “motivation by perverse sexual desires is too broad to constitute a single criminal objective.”
State v. Daniels 765 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Daniels 765 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“When the district court has discretion to impose consecutive sentences, we will uphold the sentences unless they are disproportionate to the offense or unfairly exaggerate[ ] the criminality of the defendant’s conduct.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by