Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Guardianship of Wells, 733 N.W.2d 506.

30 citing documents.

In re the Guardianship of Barbara Somerson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Guardianship of Suad Sharif Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts are “limited to determining whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship of Devin Ziegler Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A reviewing court is limited to determining whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” d 506, 510 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Guardianship of the Person of Lance Alvin Melser, In re the Guardianship of Cory James Wojtowicz Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Guardianship of Ahmed Elfatih-Ahmed Tawil Minn. Ct. App. 2025
4 court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility .” In re Guardianship of Wells , d 506, 510 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship of: Doris Anita Seward Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(regarding statutory interpretation), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of: Sherry Linn Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Therefore, we are “limited to determining whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” d 506, 510 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship of: Doris Anita Seward Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Guardianship of: Doris Anita Seward Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The district court found Yess’s testimony to be credible, and we give “due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship of: Jeferson De Jesus Lemus Corpeno Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Guardianship of: Jeferson De Jesus Lemus Corpeno Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 506, 510 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1 “The appointment of a guardian is uniquely within the discretion of the appointing court, and we will not interfere with the exercise of that discretion except in the case of a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of Brianna Orwig, Person Subject to Guardianship Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Brianna Orwig, Person Subject to Guardianship Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A reviewing court is limited to determining whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Carolyn Neu Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- 08 (Minn. App. 2007) (affirming appointment of third -party conservator despite person subject to conservatorship expressing preference for one of her daughters due to intrafamily conflict) , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of Ednord Alcenat Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 error and view the record in the light most favorable to those findings, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship of: Ryan Van Huyen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
DECISION “The appointment of a guardian is generally within the discretion of the district court.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship of: Kevin Andrews Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See In re Guardianship of Wells , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of the Person of Roseann Lynn Broome (a.k.a. Bonaparte) Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We review a district court’s order appointing a guardian to determine “whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations [about] witness credibility.” review 1 Many of the guardi anship statutes, Minn. Stat. §§ 524.5-101 to - 505 (2018) , were amended effective August 1, 2020.
In re the Guardianship of: Daniel Joseph Haggenmiller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
5 This court reviews a district court’s order appointing a guardian to determine “whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” In re Guardianship of Wells , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Emergency Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of: Gary Burke Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A reviewing court is limited to determining whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” d 506, 510 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship and Conservatorship of: Reinhold Struhs Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A reviewing court is limited to determining whether the distr ict court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of Laye Komara, minor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Guardianship of Wells , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re Guardianship of Charles Rottelo, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Guardianship of Charles Rottelo, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A reviewing court is limited to determining whether the district court’s findings are clearly erroneous, giving due regard to the district court’s determinations regarding witness credibility.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of the Estate of David Tracy Platz, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re: Guardianship of the Estate of David Tracy Platz, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-09 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Sept.