DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard County Health & Human Services v. Zacher, 742 N.W.2d 223.

15 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Rachel Naomi Simpson v. Jonathan Edward Simpson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Zacher, see also Sherburne Cnty.
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Suzanne Cross v. Joseph Drew Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Zacher, (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Tabatha Annette Cusick n/k/a Tabatha Annette Biegler v. Mark Anthony Cusick Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel v. Michael James Rossman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Zacher, (citation omitted ).
Hubbard County Social Services, Amy Alyssa Post v. Samuel Morton Post III Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund v. Jeffrey W. Lund Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Fadumo Salad v. Hassan Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Etsegenet Setegn, Hennepin County v. Belay Assefa Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: Peter H. Stier v. Debra A. Peterson, n/k/a Debra A. Hershberger, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli v. Stacy Lynn Fumagalli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks v. Carl Grant Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 837 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2013
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 837 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2013
The court noted that, under its decision in Hubbard County Health & earnings retained by a subchapter S corporation are generally not gross income if they are retained for a legitimate business reason rather than to shield or manipulate assets to avoid a child-support obligation.
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012