Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard County Health & Human Services v. Zacher, 742 N.W.2d 223.

15 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Zacher, see also Sherburne Cnty.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Zacher, (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Zacher, (citation omitted ).
Hubbard County Social Services, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Fadumo Salad, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Etsegenet Setegn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: Peter H. Stier, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 837 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2013
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 837 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2013
The court noted that, under its decision in Hubbard County Health & earnings retained by a subchapter S corporation are generally not gross income if they are retained for a legitimate business reason rather than to shield or manipulate assets to avoid a child-support obligation.
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012