Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hughes, 758 N.W.2d 577.

38 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts generally do not “consider issues raised for the first time on appeal, even constitutional questions of criminal procedure.” State v. 20 Hughes
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-95 (Minn. 2019) (reasoning that the supreme court has held that the right to counsel “applies at all critical stages of a criminal prosecution” (quotation omitted)); 146 (Minn. App. 2013) (citing first Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 358 (1977); aff’d, ) (reasoning that the United States Supreme Court has recognized sentencing as a critical stage in a criminal proceeding and 7 holding that because restitution is part of a criminal sentence, restitution is also a critical stage of a criminal p
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court will generally not “consider issues raised for the first time on appeal, even constitutional questions of criminal procedure.” d 577, 582 (Minn. 2008).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdr aw a guilty plea once it is entered.” State v. Hughes
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it is entered.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it [has been] entered.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a gu ilty plea once it [has been] entered.”
Douglas Edwin Minor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(explaining that appellate courts generally will not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal).
Manuel Enrique Muro Martinez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
And, the Court in Blakely “announced a new rule of fe deral constitutional criminal procedure and [such rules] apply to cases pending on direct review or not yet final but not to cases on collateral review such as a petition for postconviction relief.”
State v. Meger 901 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 2017
State v. Meger 901 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 2017
-82 (Minn. 2008); -95 (Minn. 2006).
Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it [has been] entered.”
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant who seeks to withdraw his guilty plea under Rule 15.05 after sentencing must bring the motion to withdraw in a petition for postconviction relief.”
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4(3)(a) (“[A]n appeal by the defendant must be filed within 90 days after final judgment or entry of the order being appealed.”); (“The 90-day appeal period for direct appeals begins to run upon entry of a final judgment, which occurs when there is a judgment of conviction .
Jolonda Rae Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jolonda Rae Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Shawn Michael O'Connell v. State of Minnesota 858 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Shawn Michael O'Connell v. State of Minnesota 858 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Our supreme court rejected this contention in State v. Hughes, noting that a postconviction petition seeks collateral review of a conviction, and a motion to withdraw a guilty plea does not extend the direct appeal period because withdrawal is “discretionary with the postconviction court.”
Terelle Eugene Shaw v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terelle Eugene Shaw v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that, “if a defendant does not file a direct appeal, his conviction is 5 final for retroactivity purposes when the time to file a direct appeal has expired.”).
Steven Daniel Waldor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Daniel Waldor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Borg 834 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2013
State v. Borg 834 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2013
State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Borg 823 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Borg 823 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
And this court has recognized that “‘payment of court-ordered restitution’ is part of a criminal ‘sentence.’” aff ’d
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
d *400 643, 646 (Minn.2007).