Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rucker, 752 N.W.2d 538.

92 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A prosecutor may discuss “‘factors affecting the credibility of the witnesses ,’ but may not imply that the state endorses a witness ’s credibility.” State v. Rucker , (quoting Swanson, d at 656), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Rucker , (quoting Swanson, d at 656), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“But a jury need not agree unanimously with respect to the alternative means or ways in which a crime can be committed.” (emphasis added), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
special attention should be paid to statements that may prejudice or inflame the jury.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“But a jury need not agree unanimously with respect to the alternative means or ways in which a crime can be committed.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
However, we have repeatedly he ld that the other bad act does not need to be identical to the charged crime, see State v. Rucker , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Prosecutors act improperly when they suggest that the arguments of defense counsel are part of some so rt of syndrome of standard arguments that one finds defense counsel making in cases of this sort.” State v. Rucker , (quotations omitted) , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“But a jury need not agree unanimously with respect to the alternative means or ways in which a crime can be committed.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
A16-1804 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
51 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Scruggs , -51 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“But a jury verdict need not agree unanimously with respect to the alternative means or ways in which a crime can be committed.” State v. Rucker , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“But a jury need not agree unanimously with respect to the alternative means or ways in which a crime can be committed.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. James Roland Bain Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. James Roland Bain Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“If the jury instructions correctly state the law in language that can be understood by the jury, there is no reversible error.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Edwin Gochingco Reyes 890 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Edwin Gochingco Reyes 890 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Williams Wermers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Williams Wermers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[A] prosecutor may make reasonable inferences from the facts.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Wesley Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Charles Wesley Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Nathaniel Donald Beulah Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nathaniel Donald Beulah Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Clark, d at 346; Kennedy, d at 391-92; Wermerskirchen, d at 242; -51 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Marshall Johnson, a/k/a Michael Tate Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael Marshall Johnson, a/k/a Michael Tate Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Paul Andrew Skog Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Paul Andrew Skog Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Michalec Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Michalec Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Thomas Boutilier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Thomas Boutilier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If different acts each constitute an element of the charged crime, “the jury must unanimously agree on which acts the defendant committed.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-48 (Minn.App.2008) (rejecting unanimous verdict argument where child victims testified about ongoing abuse, the prosecution did not emphasize or distinguish the proof of some incidents compared to others or encourage the jury to find certain incidents were more likely to have occurred than others, and appellant d
State v. Dalbec 789 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Dalbec 789 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In a similar vein, review denied (Minn. Sept.
Finnegan v. State 764 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2009

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by