Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp., 752 N.W.2d 518.

61 citing documents.

State v. Harvey 932 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2019
See, e.g. , State v. Davis , , 539 n.10 (Minn. 2012) (determining that appellant's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims "are without merit because counsel's failure to raise meritless objections is not ineffective assistance of counsel"); Hannon v. State , , 522 (Minn. 2008) (same).
A18-1962 A18-1963 Philip Lee Carlson (A18-1162, A18-1962), Virginia Marie Carlson (A18-1163, A18-1963) v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And although a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a fair and impartial judge, we 13 “presume that a judge has discharged her duties properly.” d 518, 522 (Minn. 2008).
In the Matter of: Kari Dale Hickey v. Dirk Anthony Hummel Minn. Ct. App. 2018
I n reviewing claims of judicial bias, an appellate court considers whether the district court “considered arguments and motions made by both sides, ruled in favor of a complaining [party] on any 6 issue, and took actions to minimize prejudice to the defendant .” Hannon v. State
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt v. Gary Dennis Vogt Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In reviewing claims of judicial bias, we consider whether the district court “considered arguments and motions made by bo th sides, ruled in favor of a complaining [party] on any issue, and took ac tions to minimize prejudice.” Hannon v. State
In Re the Marriage of: NaCole LaVae Ferden v. Kristopher Kollen Ferden, County of Clay, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In reviewing claims of judicial bias, an appellate court considers whether the district court “considered arguments and motions made by both sides, ruled in favor of a complaining [party] on any 9 issue, and took actions to minimize pre judice to the defend ant.” Hannon v. State
In re the Matter of: Jessica Leah Weiss, Hennepin County, intervenor v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kevin Terrance Hannon v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2017
Hannon v. State (Hannon III)
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But the judge has also made rulings in West’s favor, and “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
State of Minnesota v. Marlow Shelton McDonald Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rather, the bias must be proved in light of the record as a whole.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that adverse rulings do not, in and of themselves, demonstrate judicial bias).
Hannon v. State 781 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2010
Hannon v. State (Hannon III)